Corporate sustainability disclosure’s importance in China: financial analysts’ perception

Abstract

Purpose Corporate sustainability in China has become a subject of increasing international concern. Corporate sustainability disclosure (CSD) is considered a useful tool to facilitate the empowerment and acknowledgement of stakeholders in the quest for sustainability. However, the degree of cultural and political influences for being sustainably orientated can be significantly different between countries. This study aims to examine the perception of financial analysts, as CSD report users, in China about the level of importance of various indicators of corporate sustainability described in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Design/methodology/approach A set of questionnaires was developed based on GRI G4 guidelines to measure the perception of financial analysts in China on the level of importance of each sustainability indicator described in the GRI G4. A five-point Likert scale was used to measure the report users’ perceptions of each of the indicators. Findings The findings of this study increase our understanding of how Chinese CSD report users perceive corporate sustainability differently from the GRI guidelines. The main results show that the environmental aspect of sustainability was seen to be important in China, followed by the social and economic aspects. Indicator-wise, “water”, “effluents and waste”, “emissions”, “compliance” and “energy” were perceived as vital in the environmental category, while “customer health and safety”, “customer privacy” and “compliance” were considered significant in the social category. Originality/value This study addresses the need for differing corporate sustainability guidelines for different nations and cultures, specifically within the Chinese context. It also contributes to the corporate sustainability literature by adding to our understanding of how financial analysts in China, as CSD report users, perceive aspects of sustainability.

Factors influencing corporate social responsibility disclosures in Nepalese banks

“…Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has now been widely accepted as an essential issue for corporations. The relationship of business with the society and the environment has been long discussed since the middle of last century (Turker, 2009;Zhang et al, 2019). Specifically, however, over the previous two decades, CSR advocates have increasingly focused on a wide range of issues: environmentalsuch as climate change, waste management, water usage, global warming; socialsuch as poverty, social equality, corruption, human rights, community relations and economicsuch as employment, GDP, growth rate (Ioannou and Serafeim, 2019;Bhatia and Makkar, 2019).…”

Impacts of combined assurance on integrated, sustainability and financial reporting qualities: Evidence from listed companies in South Africa

“…Content analysis method on IR reports of sample firms was used to produce data regarding IR quality and CA quality, whereas financial and ESG quality data of the sample firms were sourced from the Bloomberg database. Content analysis has been broadly used in sustainability reporting research (Djajadikerta & Trireksani, 2012; Trireksani et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2019). This study used two trained researchers for the coding process to confirm the results' reliability (Krippendorff, 2004, 2012; Ong et al, 2016; Pistoni et al, 2018; Zhou et al, 2017).…”

“…The final sample in this study included 71 JSE listed firms. (Djajadikerta & Trireksani, 2012;Trireksani et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2019). This study used two trained researchers for the coding process to confirm the results' reliability (Krippendorff, 2004(Krippendorff, , 2012Ong et al, 2016;Pistoni et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2017…”

Exploring the implementation of sustainable development goals: a comparison between private and state-owned enterprises in Indonesia

“…While annual reports could be used as the simplest medium to report sustainability performance, there have been several standards or guidelines related to sustainability set by non-government international organizations. One of the most commonly used guidelines is one that is published by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), an independent organization that has concerns over sustainability reporting and has developed and constantly updated its set of guidelines for sustainability reporting since 2000 (Istianingsih et al, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ). Nowadays, GRI-based stand-alone sustainability reports have become more commonly produced by organizations, separately from their annual reports (Trireksani et al, 2021 ).…”