2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1532668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Taxation and the Choice of Patent Location within Multinational Firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, evidence attests that inequalities widen more remarkably in intangibleintensive MNEs. Again, this observation is consistent with earlier work revealing that a strategic management of intellectual property (IP) and a relocation of rights offer supplementary opportunities to route income through tax-friendly jurisdictions (e.g., Dischinger and Riedel, 2011;Karkinsky and Riedel, 2012;Griffith, Miller, and O'Connell, 2014;Alstadsaeter, Barrios, Nicodème, Skonieczna, and Vezzani, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, evidence attests that inequalities widen more remarkably in intangibleintensive MNEs. Again, this observation is consistent with earlier work revealing that a strategic management of intellectual property (IP) and a relocation of rights offer supplementary opportunities to route income through tax-friendly jurisdictions (e.g., Dischinger and Riedel, 2011;Karkinsky and Riedel, 2012;Griffith, Miller, and O'Connell, 2014;Alstadsaeter, Barrios, Nicodème, Skonieczna, and Vezzani, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There is compelling evidence on the existence of IP-related profit shifting schemes (Dischinger and Riedel, 2011;Karkinsky and Riedel, 2012;Griffith et al, 2014;Alstadsaeter et al, 2018). Prior research also suggests that IP-related profit shifting is one of the most important profit shifting channels (Beer and Loeprick, 2015;Heckemeyer and Overesch, 2017;Barrios and d'Andria, 2020).…”
Section: Testable Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, while the implied tax semi-elasticities are large, similar magnitudes have been found in other profit shifting contexts, e.g. a tax semi-elasticity for patents of -3.8 (Karkinsky and Riedel, 2012).…”
Section: Relocation Of Proprietary Tradingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, studies of specific methods of profit shifting have found decidedly higher tax semi-elasticities. For example, Karkinsky and Riedel (2012) document a semi-elasticity of -3.8 for patent applications; Dudar and Voget (2016) find a semi-elasticity of -6.2 for trademarks. These comparisons indicate that the tax sensitivity of assets held for proprietary trading is high, but comparable to other assets that firms relocate specifically in response to tax differentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key focus of the literature on shifting to havens is in identifying the various shifting techniques. A variety of ways have been identified, including manipulating transfer prices between affiliates [Cristea & Nguyen 2016;Davies et al 2018;Liu et al 2020;Wier 2020], the strategic location of intellectual property [Dischinger & Riedel 2011;Karkinsky & Riedel 2012;Griffith et al 2014], international debt shifting [Fuest et al 2011;Buettner & Wamser 2013] and treaty shopping [Hong 2018;Riet & Lejour 2018]. We refer to Heckemeyer & Overesch (2017) and Beer et al (2020) for comprehensive surveys.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%