2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate ventriloquism undermines action on alcohol harms

Abstract: Industry, women’s rights, and WHO’s draft alcohol strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underlined by pragmatism and manifested as contradictions, hyper-adaptability enables corporations to use their strategies in different cultural, social, political, economic and jurisdictional settings and at different time points by selecting strategically from the menu of claims and practices and tailoring their narratives and actions to the cultural zeitgeist. 83 One example is their approach to the transferability of evidence between settings. Where evidence from other countries is unfavourable to UCIs’ interests (eg, showing product harms or policy effectiveness), 57 , 61 corporate actors argue the evidence cannot be valid elsewhere; where that evidence serves their interests (often evidence they have produced), they promote it, claiming it is relevant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlined by pragmatism and manifested as contradictions, hyper-adaptability enables corporations to use their strategies in different cultural, social, political, economic and jurisdictional settings and at different time points by selecting strategically from the menu of claims and practices and tailoring their narratives and actions to the cultural zeitgeist. 83 One example is their approach to the transferability of evidence between settings. Where evidence from other countries is unfavourable to UCIs’ interests (eg, showing product harms or policy effectiveness), 57 , 61 corporate actors argue the evidence cannot be valid elsewhere; where that evidence serves their interests (often evidence they have produced), they promote it, claiming it is relevant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Experts warned policymakers and the public that, in addition to the direct health consequences of the virus itself, the pandemic would create, exacerbate, and compound a variety of mental health, substance use, and problem gambling concerns. [2][3][4] Increased loneliness, depression, grief, and anxiety, 3,5 substance use and overdose, 5 and problem gambling and related harms 6 would intersect with and compound pre-existing concerns, 7 placing additional demands on community-based service agencies, many of which were perennially under-resourced and regularly operating over capacity prior to the pandemic. 8 At the same time, the pandemic would also leave widespread service disruptions in its wake: lockdowns, physical distancing requirements, staffing shortages, and rapid shifts in service delivery modalities (e.g., the shift to virtual delivery models) which would reduce the availability and accessibility of community-based mental health and addiction services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%