1999
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod61.4.921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corpus Luteum Development and Function in Cattle with Episodic Release of Luteinizing Hormone Pulses Inhibited in the Follicular and Early Luteal Phases of the Estrous Cycle1

Abstract: The influence of episodic LH pulses before and subsequent to ovulation on size and function of the corpus luteum (CL) in cattle was examined. Treatments were 1) control; 2) LHRH antagonist starting 2 days before the preovulatory LH surge (Antagonist [Ant] -2); 3) LHRH antagonist at initiation of the preovulatory LH surge (Ant 0); and 4) LHRH antagonist starting 2 days after the preovulatory LH surge (Ant 2). Treatments with an LHRH antagonist were continued until 7 days after the preovulatory surge. Diameter o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stress might also reduce fertility by negatively affecting CL formation. LH pulses after the pre‐ovulatory LH surge are necessary for both structural and functional CL development in cattle (Quintal‐Franco et al. 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress might also reduce fertility by negatively affecting CL formation. LH pulses after the pre‐ovulatory LH surge are necessary for both structural and functional CL development in cattle (Quintal‐Franco et al. 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1980s, it was demonstrated during the midluteal phase that the peak of a progesterone fluctuation occurs 10 min after the peak of an LH pulse [49]. The essentiality of LH for progesterone production by the bovine corpus luteum was well established in the 1990s [50]. During the past decade, the temporal and functional association between LH pulses and progesterone fluctuations have been clarified, and the involvement of both PGF and LH in progesterone rebounds have been demonstrated.…”
Section: Progesterone Rebounds and Lh-driven Progesterone Fluctuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparatively poor beneficial impact of buserelin acetate on luteal profile can be justified by the less duration and amplitude of the induced LH surge which plays a role in optimum differentiation and growth rate of CL (Quintal-Franco et al 1999). In normal circumstances, the duration of preovulatory LH surge is 10 h (Chenault et al 1990), whereas GnRH analogueinduced LH surge starting 2 h after GnRH administration lasts to 7 h in buffalo (Roy and Prakash 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%