2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2791-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CORR Insights™: Intramedullary Nails Result in More Reoperations Than Sliding Hip Screws in Two-part Intertrochanteric Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since its introduction in the 1980s, cephalomedullary fixation for IT fractures in the elderly has gained popularity. Aside from the theoretical advantage of being less invasive and biomechanically superior 17 19 , these devices have been advocated in cases of unstable fracture patterns such as reverse obliquity, lateral wall incompetence, subtrochanteric extension, and medial calcar disruption 8 , 20 , 21 . A review of reverse obliquity fractures in a large Scandinavian patient registry has corroborated the use of the nail, demonstrating a higher re-operation rate (6.4% versus 3.8%) at 1 year in the sliding hip screw (SHS) group compared with the intramedullary nail group, as well as a higher pain score and lower satisfaction rating.…”
Section: Intertrochanteric Hip Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction in the 1980s, cephalomedullary fixation for IT fractures in the elderly has gained popularity. Aside from the theoretical advantage of being less invasive and biomechanically superior 17 19 , these devices have been advocated in cases of unstable fracture patterns such as reverse obliquity, lateral wall incompetence, subtrochanteric extension, and medial calcar disruption 8 , 20 , 21 . A review of reverse obliquity fractures in a large Scandinavian patient registry has corroborated the use of the nail, demonstrating a higher re-operation rate (6.4% versus 3.8%) at 1 year in the sliding hip screw (SHS) group compared with the intramedullary nail group, as well as a higher pain score and lower satisfaction rating.…”
Section: Intertrochanteric Hip Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%