CORR Insights®: A Crosswalk Between UCLA and Lower Extremity Activity Scales

O’Connor, Daniel P.

doi:10.1007/s11999-016-5172-x

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The need for multi-institutional research collaboration has also been emphasized in the context of PROs, yet inconsistency in the measures that are utilized across institutions remains a limitation 19 . PROs of function among patients with lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas were investigated in a systematic review by Kask et al, who demonstrated that TESS was utilized in 43% of the studies and that the MSTS score was utilized in 32% 8 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The MSTS recognized this issue and has since aimed to increase collaborative and multi-institutional research projects through the establishment of the Musculoskeletal Oncology Research Initiative (MORI) and through the funding of multicenter trials such as Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) and Surveillance After Extremity Tumor Surgery (SAFETY). The need for multi-institutional research collaboration has also been emphasized in the context of PROs, yet inconsistency in the measures that are utilized across institutions remains a limitation 19 . PROs of function among patients with lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas were investigated in a systematic review by Kask et al, who demonstrated that TESS was utilized in 43% of the studies and that the MSTS score was utilized in 32% 8 .…”

Section: Correlation and Mathematical Relationship Between Le Tess An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Correlate with the Lower Extremity Toronto Extremity Salvage Score

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) are both utilized to measure patient-reported outcomes in adults with musculoskeletal oncologic conditions. However, the relationship between them has not been studied. We sought to describe a link between Lower Extremity (LE) TESS and PROMIS Physical Function (PF) scores, as well as between LE TESS and Pain Interference (PI) scores, to develop a method for converting scores between TESS and PROMIS and to examine whether TESS and PROMIS captured differences in pain and function between clinically relevant subgroups in our population. Methods: Our study population consisted of 125 adult patients who underwent surgical treatment of a lower-extremity musculoskeletal tumor at a single sarcoma center between December 2015 and October 2018. The LE TESS questionnaire was administered to patients via paper and the PROMIS PF and PI were administered via iPad at a preoperative appointment. The relationship between LE TESS and PROMIS measures was analyzed with use of generalized linear modeling. Subgroup analyses were performed with a 2-tailed t test or 1-way analysis of variance. Results: PROMIS PF had a very strong positive correlation with LE TESS (r = 0.83) and was related through the following equation: PROMIS PF = 0.00294 × (LE TESS)2 + 22.6. PROMIS PI had a strong negative correlation with LE TESS (r = –0.77) and was related through the following equation: PROMIS PI = −0.00259 × (LE TESS)2 + 73.8. PROMIS PF and PI performed similarly to LE TESS across multiple patient subgroups and captured the expected differences between subgroups. Conclusions: LE TESS and PROMIS PF appeared to measure similar information in patients with an orthopaedic oncologic condition. Moreover, PROMIS PI scores were strongly correlated with functional disability as measured with the LE TESS. Understanding the relationship between TESS and PROMIS will allow the comparison and combination of data for both clinical and research purposes. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Correlation and Mathematical Relationship Between Le Tess An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Correlate with the Lower Extremity Toronto Extremity Salvage Score

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Development of a mapping function ("crosswalk") for the conversion of scores between the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crosswalk between the PROMIS physical function CAT and PROMIS upper extremity CAT v1.2 in a hand surgery population

Rogers,

Daryoush,

Zhang

et al. 2024

J Patient Rep Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background There is no gold standard patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hand surgery. As a result, a diverse array of PROM instruments have been utilized across centers over time. Lack of score interchangeability limits the ability to compare or conglomerate scores when new instruments are introduced. Our aim was to develop a linkage for the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS PF CAT scores and develop crosswalk tables for interconversion between these PROMs. Methods Retrospective review was conducted to identify adult (≥ 18y) patients seen by orthopaedic hand surgeons at a single academic tertiary care hospital who had completed PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS PF CAT score at the same visit. For those with multiple visits, only one randomly selected visit was included in the analyses. Pearson’s correlation was calculated to determine the linear relationship between the scores. Linkage from PF to UE was performed utilizing several commonly utilized equating models (identity, mean, linear, equipercentile and circle-arc methods). The performance of the models was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC) between observed PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and estimated PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 scores generated using the model as well as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The model chosen as the ‘best’ was further assessed for population invariance using root expected mean squared difference (REMSD) where < 0.08 were considered good. Results Of 10,081 included patients, mean age was 48.3 (SD = 17.0), and 54% were female (5,477/10,081). Mean UE CAT v1.2 and PF CAT scores were 37 (SD = 9.8) and 46 (SD = 10.0), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the scores (Pearson correlation r = 0.70). All methods performed acceptably (ICC ≥ 0.66 and RMSE < = 7.52 for all). The equipercentile method had the highest ICC (ICC = 0.70 (95% CI 0.69–0.71)) while the mean and circle arc methods had the lowest RMSE. The circle arc method is the most reliable with the smallest standard error and has satisfactory population invariance across age group (REMSD 0.065) and sex (REMSD 0.036). Conclusions Crosswalk tables to be used for bidirectional conversion between scores were created. Level of evidence : III.

show abstract

CORR Insights®: A Crosswalk Between UCLA and Lower Extremity Activity Scales

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Correlate with the Lower Extremity Toronto Extremity Salvage Score

PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Correlate with the Lower Extremity Toronto Extremity Salvage Score

Development of a mapping function ("crosswalk") for the conversion of scores between the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)

Crosswalk between the PROMIS physical function CAT and PROMIS upper extremity CAT v1.2 in a hand surgery population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About