2020
DOI: 10.1002/prop.202000063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‐Corrected Poisson‐Lie T‐Duality

Abstract: We propose leading order α′‐corrections to the Poisson‐Lie T‐duality transformation rules of the metric, B‐field, and dilaton. Based on Double Field Theory, whose corrections to this order are known, we argue that they map conformal field theories to conformal field theories. Remarkably, Born geometry plays a central role in the construction.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computation strongly relies on the imposition of the strong constraint. The same result was reproduced in a double language and very nicely related to Born geometry in [58].…”
Section: Jhep01(2021)171 5 Summary and Outlooksupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The computation strongly relies on the imposition of the strong constraint. The same result was reproduced in a double language and very nicely related to Born geometry in [58].…”
Section: Jhep01(2021)171 5 Summary and Outlooksupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Unlike Abelian T-duality, which is an equivalence between string theories on different backgrounds to all orders in the string coupling and string length, these generalised Tduality are currently best understood at the supergravity level and their status as true dualities of the string genus expansion remains doubtful [6]. Very recent work [7][8][9][10] has provided indications that such dualities do persist under α corrections. Both NATD and PLTD have led to fruitful results.…”
Section: Jhep01(2021)020mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For E 6(6) this tensor is related to the symmetric invariant (see the appendix for details) such that the explicit form of E A has components Here we denote r a 1 ...am = r a 1 ∧ • • • ∧ r am and make use of the j-wedge contraction of [37] to deal with mixed symmetry fields. 8 One can consider now the action of the frame field E A on these E A and by virtue of eq. (3.11), again find that they furnish the EDA algebra, albeit in a different representation as described in the appendix.…”
Section: Jhep01(2021)020mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would not only be interesting to answer this question for the current exact S matrix, but also to investigate the tree-level and exact S matrices for deformations of AdS 3 × S 3 where it is possible to realize mirror duality explicitly also in the fermionic sector of the sigma model [39]. Next, for the exact S matrix and Bethe ansatz description of these models it is important to understand the precise identification of the exact parameters q and ξ and the Lagrangian parameters κ and h. This is related to questions surrounding quantum corrections to Yang-Baxter deformed backgrounds, where initial studies have thus far focused on α corrections for homogeneous deformations [40,41], and corrections to (not Weyl invariant) deformed backgrounds to maintain compatibility with RG flow [42,43], see also the very recent [44,45]. At the level of quantum corrections, it would also be great to investigate the one-loop S matrices for both the distinguished and fermionic deformations along the lines of [46], as at loop level we are generically sensitive to Weyl invariance.…”
Section: Jhep12(2020)043mentioning
confidence: 99%