Correcting Language Mistakes in Qualitative Research Articles

Barroga, Edward; Matanguihan, Glafera Janet

doi:10.47316/cajmhe.2020.1.2.08

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Eliminating Language Errors and Poor Writingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Subject-verb disagreements, faulty parallelisms, and incorrect comparisons appear to be the main language mistakes of non-Anglophone scholarly authors [6,22]. Subject-verb disagreements usually occur in long and complex sentences, reiterating the need for conciseness and coherence [8,22,23,24]. When writing parallel comparisons, coordinating conjunctions, correlative conjunctions, and correlative constructions must be used to denote the parallelism [23,25].…”

Section: Eliminating Language Errors and Poor Writingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Unfamiliarity With Key Elements of Scholarly Writing and Research Impedes Ethical Publishing

Barroga

2023

CAJMHE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific authors must become familiar with the key elements of scholarly writing and research to ensure ethical publishing. They should be proficient in writing the different sections of scholarly articles. Their knowledge of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods procedures must be sufficiently deep, including how to develop research questions and hypotheses. The authors must aim to be flawless when drafting scholarly articles to facilitate a deeper understanding of the extracted concepts. They should avoid duplicate publication, plagiarism, and salami science. When conducting research, the authors should ensure protection of human subjects and avoid bias.

show abstract

Section: Eliminating Language Errors and Poor Writingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Eliminating Language Errors and Poor Writingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unfamiliarity With Key Elements of Scholarly Writing and Research Impedes Ethical Publishing

Barroga

2023

CAJMHE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In quantitative research, researchers describe existing theories, generate and test a hypothesis in novel research, and re-evaluate existing theories deductively based on their experimental results. 1 4 5 In qualitative research, scientific researchers raise and answer research questions by performing a novel study, then propose new theories by clarifying their results inductively. 1 6…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research

Barroga,

Matanguihan,

Furuta

et al. 2023

J Korean Med Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comprehensive knowledge of quantitative and qualitative research systematizes scholarly research and enhances the quality of research output. Scientific researchers must be familiar with them and skilled to conduct their investigation within the frames of their chosen research type. When conducting quantitative research, scientific researchers should describe an existing theory, generate a hypothesis from the theory, test their hypothesis in novel research, and re-evaluate the theory. Thereafter, they should take a deductive approach in writing the testing of the established theory based on experiments. When conducting qualitative research, scientific researchers raise a question, answer the question by performing a novel study, and propose a new theory to clarify and interpret the obtained results. After which, they should take an inductive approach to writing the formulation of concepts based on collected data. When scientific researchers combine the whole spectrum of inductive and deductive research approaches using both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, they apply mixed-method research. Familiarity and proficiency with these research aspects facilitate the construction of novel hypotheses, development of theories, or refinement of concepts.

show abstract

Top Central Asian Educational Institutions on Publons: Analysis of Researchers and Reviewers

Ahmed

Anirvan

2021

J Korean Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Correcting Language Mistakes in Qualitative Research Articles

Cited by 4 publications

References 9 publications

Unfamiliarity With Key Elements of Scholarly Writing and Research Impedes Ethical Publishing

Unfamiliarity With Key Elements of Scholarly Writing and Research Impedes Ethical Publishing

Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research

Top Central Asian Educational Institutions on Publons: Analysis of Researchers and Reviewers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About