1979
DOI: 10.1016/0968-0004(79)90182-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting Lineweaver—Burt calculations of V and Km

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They generally agreed within 10%, and the mean was used. However, when a significant amount of substrate was consumed (≥15% at initial concentrations below K m ), the rate from each time interval was handled separately and plotted against the average substrate concentration in the time interval, as recommended by Glick et al . (1979).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They generally agreed within 10%, and the mean was used. However, when a significant amount of substrate was consumed (≥15% at initial concentrations below K m ), the rate from each time interval was handled separately and plotted against the average substrate concentration in the time interval, as recommended by Glick et al . (1979).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a comparison of the number of citations, Glick, Landman, and Roufogalis (1979) conclude that this analysis procedure still appears to be widely used by enzyme researchers, despite the fact that the simulation analyses by Dowd and Riggs (1965) and Colquhoun (1969) showed that this procedure is by far the worst of all proposed estimation methods. The oldest and still most widely used procedure is based on equation (2), which is known as the Lineweaver-Burk plot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is a certain difference between Vm and Km calculated by the Lineweaver buck method and the Wilkinson statistical method. The Wilkinson statistical method is considered to be reliable [ 26 ]. Therefore, the Michaelis equation obtained by the Wilkinson statistical method is finally selected as the final result.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%