1987
DOI: 10.1021/ja00238a602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction. An Approach toward the Complete FAB Analysis of Enzymic Digests of Peptides and Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and is due matrix effects [41]. However, it is not clear why suppression of certain secondary ions is occurring in these experiments.…”
Section: Secondary Ion Yields: Polymer Filmsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…and is due matrix effects [41]. However, it is not clear why suppression of certain secondary ions is occurring in these experiments.…”
Section: Secondary Ion Yields: Polymer Filmsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The mass signaIs shifted according to the mass value of the N-terminal residue and this procedure repeated once or twice allowed to identify unambiguously the peptides. Since a partial suppression of the signaIs taking place in FAB analysis (Naylor et al, 1986), having as upper detection limit about 3000 Da, ES/MS was used, especially for large peptides and proteins. These techniques were of utmost importance for identifying cheese protein and peptides characterized by a microheterogeneity such as the discrete phosphorylation and the simultaneous presence of closely related different!y long peptides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of derivatives were developed to improve the detection limits of peptide analytes. Some of these derivatives contained nonpolar functionalities to increase the surface activities of peptides during analysis by FAB and LSIMS (Falick & Maltby, 1989;Ligon, 1986;Naylor et al, 1986). Other derivatives generated preformed ions, which increased ionization efficiencies of many analytes during analysis by desorption/ionization techniques (Busch et al, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%