2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11080941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Balsamo, G., et al. Satellite and In Situ Observations for Advancing Global Earth Surface Modelling: A Review. Remote Sensing 2018, 10, 2038

Abstract: The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, observation of snow cover is carried out by a person on the ground or by measurement equipment (Dong 2018). However, this ground observation is performed at sites that are distant from each other, and thus inevitably creates a large observational gap in space (Balsamo et al 2018). Satellite data, which are remote sensing data with excellent spatial resolution, can be used as a solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, observation of snow cover is carried out by a person on the ground or by measurement equipment (Dong 2018). However, this ground observation is performed at sites that are distant from each other, and thus inevitably creates a large observational gap in space (Balsamo et al 2018). Satellite data, which are remote sensing data with excellent spatial resolution, can be used as a solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…clouds), and data gaps that jeopardize the use of the data set in 44 practical applications, as discussed in recent publications on analysis-readiness of EO data (Baumann, 45 2024). Furthermore, when a long time-series of moderate and high resolution EO data is collected, the 46 size of the dataset can exceed the petabyte (PB), making data storage, access, and elaboration prohibitive 47 for most potential users (Balsamo et al, 2018). Solutions to these problems include data imputation (often 48 named "gap-filling"), smoothing, outlier removal, space and/or time aggregation, decomposition, and 49 image compression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%