2021
DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Cap 1 Messenger RNA Synthesis with Co‐transcriptional CleanCap® Analog by In Vitro Transcription

Abstract: In the above-referenced article, an error was corrected for the concentration of Triton X-100 in the recipe for 10 × in vitro transcription (IVT) buffer in the Reagents and Solutions section, which now reads 0.02% (not 0.2%).The current version online now includes this correction and may be considered the authoritative version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CleanCap AG is used for large-scale manufacturing of the BioNTech BNT162b2 SARS-Cov 2 vaccine, demonstrating its scalability and wide utility [35]. We observed ~97% capping for T7-68 reactions using 1mM CleanCap AG, comparable to the efficiency we observed for 4mM CleanCap AG with the WT T7 RNAP, and consistent with the literature value of 94% [18]. The difference between T7-68 and the WT polymerase were even greater when compared in the same reaction buffer, indicating that the improved capping efficiency is an inherent characteristic of T7-68.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CleanCap AG is used for large-scale manufacturing of the BioNTech BNT162b2 SARS-Cov 2 vaccine, demonstrating its scalability and wide utility [35]. We observed ~97% capping for T7-68 reactions using 1mM CleanCap AG, comparable to the efficiency we observed for 4mM CleanCap AG with the WT T7 RNAP, and consistent with the literature value of 94% [18]. The difference between T7-68 and the WT polymerase were even greater when compared in the same reaction buffer, indicating that the improved capping efficiency is an inherent characteristic of T7-68.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Using the recommended conditions for co-transcriptional capping with WT T7 RNA polymerase and CleanCap AG (Buffer C, 4mM CleanCap AG), we observed 97% capping efficiency on the luciferase mRNA (Fig 4B ), consistent with the 94% value reported from the literature [18]. Maximizing capping efficiency to ~95% or greater is important to avoid the RIG-I mediated response to uncapped 5' triphosphate RNA [19].…”
Section: Capping Efficiency With a Trinucleotide Analogsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most striking one is the RNA capping strategy: although Pfizer-BioNTech has opted for a cotranscriptional capping using the recently developed CleanCap system, Moderna has adopted an enzymatic capping approach. This last option requires extensive intermediate purification steps, impacting overall recovery and RNA integrity, but yields almost 100% capped RNA, even for hard-to-cap structures [62]. Second, in vitro…”
Section: Knowledge Assessment Of Product-process Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the cap structure can be incorporated into an in vitro transcript by two means: 1) incorporation of a chemically synthesized cap structure such as the anti-reverse cap analog (ARCA) or capped dinucleotides (Henderson et al 2021) during transcription, or 2) post-transcriptional capping using a mRNA capping enzyme. These approaches have well-established methods that are readily adaptable and scalable (Fuchs et al 2016; Vaidyanathan et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%