2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Challenges of implementing Mark-recapture studies on poorly marked gregarious delphinids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using boat-based estimates, group sizes are usually estimated and later confirmed or amended by photo-identification. However, not all species are equally suited to photo-identification [60] and all individuals in a group are often not captured. Conversely, drone-based counts of small cetaceans enable all the individuals to be accurately counted and are, therefore, especially useful when studying large animal groups.…”
Section: Group Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using boat-based estimates, group sizes are usually estimated and later confirmed or amended by photo-identification. However, not all species are equally suited to photo-identification [60] and all individuals in a group are often not captured. Conversely, drone-based counts of small cetaceans enable all the individuals to be accurately counted and are, therefore, especially useful when studying large animal groups.…”
Section: Group Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All PQ-3 images were excluded from the analysis. For highly marked dolphins, both high and medium quality images were used, while moderately marked dolphins were only confidently identifiable on PQ-1 images (see also Hupman et al, 2018). All qualifying images were used to reconstruct encounter histories for dolphins in the population, resulting in a binary dataset with "1" indicating presence and "0" indicating absence in a given year.…”
Section: Data Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%