Correction: Dengue seroprevalence and force of primary infection in a representative population of urban dwelling Indonesian children

Prayitno, Ari; Taurel, Anne Frieda; Nealon, Joshua; Satari, Hindra Irawan; Karyanti, Mulya Rahma; Sekartini, Rini; Soedjatmiko, Soedjatmiko; Gunardi, Hartono; Medise, Bernie Endyarni; Sasmono, R. Tedjo; Simmerman, James Mark; Bouckenooghe, Alain; Hadinegoro, Sri Rezeki

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006467

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Community involvement in eradicating dengue is an important contribution and needs to be fostered to consciously live in a clean environment so as to prevent the proliferation of dengue fever vectors. Utilizing social capital bonding in rural areas as well as in urban areas is an attachment that makes it easy for them to empower, action and learning, both in urban and rural areas by linking the prevention of dengue fever with social bonding capital making it easier to increase bridging social capital for cooperation in the economic field so that it can be sustainable toward a healthy life [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Community Empowerment on Preventing Dengue Fever in Lampung Province, Indonesia

Farich

Lipoeto

Bachtiar

et al. 2020

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of community empowerment on preventing dengue fever in Lampung Province, Indonesia. METHODS: This study used a quasi-experimental design with two groups of pretest-posttest design. The number of samples in this study was 120 people in the intervention group and 120 people in the control group, who is a housewife living in Gading Rejo and Pringsewu subdistrict, Lampung, Indonesia. The sampling technique used a proportional stratified random sampling technique. Community empowerment interventions have been carried out through socialization and inculturation to gather information about community participation, knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of respondents in the prevention of dengue fever. Then, the next stage is the implementation of interventions with capacity building and planting dengue mosquito repellent plants. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon test using the SPSS version 21.0 software. RESULTS: This study showed that there were differences in the median score of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors between the intervention and control groups (p < 0.05). The results of the analysis based on the entomologist indicators (larvae-free numbers, house index, container index, and Breteau index) found that there were differences in larvae-free numbers, house index, and Breteau index between the intervention and control groups (p < 0.05), while there were no differences in the container index between the intervention and control groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the effects of community empowerment on preventing dengue fever in Lampung Province, Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Community Empowerment on Preventing Dengue Fever in Lampung Province, Indonesia

Farich

Lipoeto

Bachtiar

et al. 2020

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The survey results show an overall DENV IgG antibody positivity rate of 11.97 % in Baiyun District, Guangzhou City. Although the dengue infection rate is relatively lower compared to countries with high IgG antibody positivity rates (>50 %) such as India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, and Singapore, these tropical countries have previously experienced severe local outbreaks [ [22] , [23] , [24] ]. Notably, in 2019, a total of 1655 confirmed cases of dengue fever were reported in Guangzhou, with an incidence rate of 11.10 per 100,000 people.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distinct serum exosomal miRNA profiles detected in acute and asymptomatic dengue infections: A community-based study in Baiyun District, Guangzhou

Li,

Liao,

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Approximately 4,701,100 children, the number of Indonesian children in the age group of 9 years old, were considered as the target population for a nationwide dengue vaccination program that was in line with the recommended age for dengue vaccination in Indonesia [22]. The cohort was followed up over a 10-year time horizon with a 1-year analytical cycle by considering the highest seroprevalence in Indonesia in an age group that ranged between 9 and 18 years old [23]. Dengue infection (46.12 in 100,000 population) and mortality (0.83%) rates were estimated from rates over the last 10 years in Indonesia [24].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cost-Effectiveness of Dengue Vaccination in Indonesia: Considering Integrated Programs with Wolbachia-Infected Mosquitos and Health Education

Suwantika

Kautsar

Supadmi

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the fact that morbidity and mortality rates due to dengue infection in Indonesia are relatively high, a dengue vaccination has not yet been introduced. Next to vaccination, Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes and health education have been considered to be potential interventions to prevent dengue infection in Indonesia. This study was aimed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination in Indonesia whilst taking Wolbachia and health education programs into account. An age-structured decision tree model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness. Approximately 4,701,100 children were followed-up in a 10-year time horizon within a 1-year analytical cycle. We compared three vaccination strategies: one focussing on vaccination only, another combining vaccination and a Wolbachia program, and a third scenario combining vaccination and health education. All scenarios were compared with a no-intervention strategy. The result showed that only vaccination would reduce dengue fever (DF), dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF), and dengue shock syndrome (DSS) by 123,203; 97,140 and 283 cases, respectively. It would save treatment cost at $10.3 million and $6.2 million from the healthcare and payer perspectives, respectively. The combination of vaccination and a Wolbachia program would reduce DF, DHF and DSS by 292,488; 230,541; and 672 cases, respectively. It would also save treatment cost at $24.3 million and $14.6 million from the healthcare and payer perspectives, respectively. The combination of vaccination and health education would reduce DF, DHF, and DSS by 187,986; 148,220; and 432 cases, respectively. It would save treatment cost at $15.6 million and $9.4 million from the healthcare and payer perspectives, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from the healthcare perspective were estimated to be $9995, $4460, and $6399 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for the respective scenarios. ICERs from the payer perspective were slightly higher. It can be concluded that vaccination combined with a Wolbachia program was confirmed to be the most cost-effective intervention. Dengue infection rate, vaccine efficacy, cost of Wolbachia program, underreporting factor for hospitalization, vaccine price and mortality rate were considered to be the most influential parameters affecting the ICERs.

show abstract

Correction: Dengue seroprevalence and force of primary infection in a representative population of urban dwelling Indonesian children

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

The Effects of Community Empowerment on Preventing Dengue Fever in Lampung Province, Indonesia

The Effects of Community Empowerment on Preventing Dengue Fever in Lampung Province, Indonesia

Distinct serum exosomal miRNA profiles detected in acute and asymptomatic dengue infections: A community-based study in Baiyun District, Guangzhou

Cost-Effectiveness of Dengue Vaccination in Indonesia: Considering Integrated Programs with Wolbachia-Infected Mosquitos and Health Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About