2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Experimental Treatment with Favipiravir for Ebola Virus Disease (the JIKI Trial): A Historically Controlled, Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial in Guinea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No EBOV therapy has been approved yet even though some displayed good potential in the animal study (18,29,30). A clinical trial of small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapy (TKM-Ebola) was suspended because the results of interim analysis were not encouraging (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No EBOV therapy has been approved yet even though some displayed good potential in the animal study (18,29,30). A clinical trial of small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapy (TKM-Ebola) was suspended because the results of interim analysis were not encouraging (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been reported to be effective in animal studies of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus, Bunyaviridae [78], West Nile virus [79], and Chikungunya virus [80]. Although it was used in the 2014 Western African epidemic of Ebola virus infection, the effects were inconsistent [81,82]. Regarding SARS-CoV-2, it was reported to inhibit viral infections at a relatively high half maximal effective concentration (EC 50 = 61.88 μM, selectivity index >6.46) [36].…”
Section: • Favipiravirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Favipiravir also showed an antiviral activity in experimental animals against other RNA viruses, including arenaviruses, alphaviruses, bunyaviruses, and flaviviruses [ 71 ]. Furthermore, preliminary results also indicated that favipiravir potentially possesses a moderate activity against Ebola [ 72 ]. Importantly, a recent nonrandomized, open-label study in patients ( n = 80) with non-severe COVID-19 showed that favipiravir (1600 mg orally twice daily on the first day, then 600 mg orally twice daily for thirteen days) with INF-α had significantly better therapeutic effects on SARS-CoV-2 infection, in terms of disease progression and viral clearance, than lopinavir/ritonavir with INF-α [ 73 ].…”
Section: Viral Polymerase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%