1971
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(71)90011-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction for fast guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time

Abstract: 1 I am indebted to Robert Ollman, especially for pointing out to me that Eq. 6, which is valid for the special case rri = rra = .5, holds more generally for any presentation probabilities in the form of Eq. 3. I thank also

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
145
2
10

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
145
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…4c Upper Left shows this increase for subjects with many or few errors overall in experiment 2. This pattern rules out interpretations of priming due to fast guessing, triggered by the mere detection of the prime (20), and is at odds with the hypothesis that primes remain unprocessed themselves but exert their effects by facilitating or inhibiting the processing of the mask (6,21). Instead, primes seem to fully activate the corresponding response, leading to incorrect responses on incongruent trials unless countermanded (which is possible at short SOAs only).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…4c Upper Left shows this increase for subjects with many or few errors overall in experiment 2. This pattern rules out interpretations of priming due to fast guessing, triggered by the mere detection of the prime (20), and is at odds with the hypothesis that primes remain unprocessed themselves but exert their effects by facilitating or inhibiting the processing of the mask (6,21). Instead, primes seem to fully activate the corresponding response, leading to incorrect responses on incongruent trials unless countermanded (which is possible at short SOAs only).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…MROM and DRC use the same mechanism for lexical decision; in particular, both models assume that "nonword" responses are given when a temporal deadline is exceeded (cf. Swensson, 1972;Yellott, 1971). The temporal deadline mechanism marks a major conceptual divide between MROM and DRC on the one hand and the diffusion model on the other.…”
Section: The Deadline Model For Lexical Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of such contamination plagues all RT research (e.g., Pachella, 1974), of course-not just research focusing on correlations. Within correlational RT research, it appears that the possibility of such contamination can be addressed only by using a formal model to combine RT and accuracy into a single measure of processing efficiency (e.g., Brown & Heathcote, 2005;Ratcliff, 1978;Yellott, 1971).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%