1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00372333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Holloway's (1977) adaptation of the modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state for calculation of the fugacities of molecular species in supercritical fluids of geologic interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplicity, the vapor phase has been assumed to be a perfect gas, though at elevated p and T it could equally well be represented more accurately by using, for example, the modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state [Flowers, 1979]. The heat content of the liquid and solid phases is much larger than that of the vapor, so exsolution takes place at nearly constant temperature.…”
Section: Mvpomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, the vapor phase has been assumed to be a perfect gas, though at elevated p and T it could equally well be represented more accurately by using, for example, the modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state [Flowers, 1979]. The heat content of the liquid and solid phases is much larger than that of the vapor, so exsolution takes place at nearly constant temperature.…”
Section: Mvpomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have calculated f~, 0 (P,T), the fugacity of pure HzO at T and P, from the modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state for H 2 0 (Holloway 1977 ;Flowers 1979). To use equation (20), we must estimate the partial molar volume of molecular water in the melt.…”
Section: Melt-vapor Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flowers (1979) pointed out that the equation used by Holloway (1976) to calculate the fugacity coefficients did not obey the Gibbs-Duhem relation and was in error. The corrected EOS predicts considerable more ideal fugacity coefficients than the uncorrected EOS.…”
Section: Holloway (1976) Holloway (1981)mentioning
confidence: 99%