2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of lower eyelid retraction with hard palate graft in the anophthalmic socket

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature reported that a variety of grafts could be used as spacers for posterior lamellae in the lower lid, and it is proposed that grafts can be divided into 4 groups: autografts, allografts, xenografts, and synthetic grafts, including the hard palate, tarsal bone, nasal septal cartilage, human cadaver acellular dermis, acellular porcinederived membrane, and high-density polyethylene. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The decision in the selection of the best graft is associated with its long-term stability, complications at recipient and donor sites, and cosmesis. Ideally, the thickness, rigidity, and contour characteristics of grafts should be close to the tarsus and conjunctiva tissues, reduce irritation of the ocular surface, have lower rejection, contractures, and better biocompatibility, be easily accessible, and be stiff to facilitate providing strong support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature reported that a variety of grafts could be used as spacers for posterior lamellae in the lower lid, and it is proposed that grafts can be divided into 4 groups: autografts, allografts, xenografts, and synthetic grafts, including the hard palate, tarsal bone, nasal septal cartilage, human cadaver acellular dermis, acellular porcinederived membrane, and high-density polyethylene. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The decision in the selection of the best graft is associated with its long-term stability, complications at recipient and donor sites, and cosmesis. Ideally, the thickness, rigidity, and contour characteristics of grafts should be close to the tarsus and conjunctiva tissues, reduce irritation of the ocular surface, have lower rejection, contractures, and better biocompatibility, be easily accessible, and be stiff to facilitate providing strong support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] In addition, it should have the ability to promote the integration of adjacent different tissues while minimizing inflammation and improving mucosal epithelialization at the conjunctival margin. 20,21 We prefer the hard palate mucosa as an autogenous graft, which provides long-term stability of lower lid elevation with structural support and mucosal surfaces mimicking conjunctiva, 16 additionally, it is abundant, easy to access, well tolerated, and resistant to contraction. Larsen et al 17 demonstrated the hard palate mucosal used to repair lower lid retraction after transplantation still maintains native epithelial morphology and provides long-term support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The autologous hard palate mucosa is similar in hardness and thickness to the tarsal plate and has a mucosal surface, which makes it a good replacement for tarsal plate materials, with no risk of rejection, but there will be more persistent sticky secretions in the eyes [5]. Commonly used autologous cartilage tissues are ear cartilage and nasal septal cartilage mucosa [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 , 11 In severe cases, spacer grafts are often used to push the lower eyelid margin upwards and to prevent it from dropping. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 Spacer materials include autografts such as hard‐palate mucosa and ear cartilage; allografts including preserved dermis (AlloDerm ® , Surederm ® ) and sclera; and synthetic grafts including polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore‐Tex) and porous polyethylene (Medpor). 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 Considering the ethical problems and probable graft rejection in children, we adopted the technique of lower eyelid retractor recession without grafting even in severe cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%