1996
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.1996.531_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Orientation Error of Borehole Strong Motion Array Records Obtained During the South Hyogo Earthquake of Jan. 17, 1995

Abstract: The orientation error of in borehole array stations was obtained during the South Hyogo of Jan. 17, 1995. The four stations on reclaimed land and the other on stiff ground, were selected The displacement on the were carefully examined, and errors were detected The significance of the of orientation error was The stress-based 2D and/or 3D analyses were applied for one of the It was demonstrated that the method could reproduce the in the case that the base motion was used as the input motion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 13(d) shows the distribution of shear wave velocity at both stations. As shown in Figure 13 The orientation error of buried seismometers regarding the record used in this study had been investigated by Sugito et al [19]. An observational direction error of 228 in the horizontal plane was detected for the seismometers installed at a depth of GL: À 83 m: The peak acceleration of each time history is significantly affected by the correction of the error, in the order of 60% larger or smaller than the original peak value.…”
Section: Ground Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Figure 13(d) shows the distribution of shear wave velocity at both stations. As shown in Figure 13 The orientation error of buried seismometers regarding the record used in this study had been investigated by Sugito et al [19]. An observational direction error of 228 in the horizontal plane was detected for the seismometers installed at a depth of GL: À 83 m: The peak acceleration of each time history is significantly affected by the correction of the error, in the order of 60% larger or smaller than the original peak value.…”
Section: Ground Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 81%