2015
DOI: 10.1364/ao.54.006763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of pathlength amplification in the filter-pad technique for measurements of particulate absorption coefficient in the visible spectral region

Abstract: Spectrophotometric measurement of particulate matter retained on filters is the most common and practical method for routine determination of the spectral light absorption coefficient of aquatic particles, ap(λ), at high spectral resolution over a broad spectral range. The use of differing geometrical measurement configurations and large variations in the reported correction for pathlength amplification induced by the particle/filter matrix have hindered adoption of an established measurement protoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectral absorption coefficient of particles, a p ( λ ), was determined at 1 nm intervals over the spectral range 300–850 nm for ICESCAPE cruises and 300–800 nm for the MALINA cruise in a dual‐beam spectrophotometer (Lambda 18, Perkin Elmer) equipped with a 15 cm integrating sphere (Labsphere). Filters were placed inside the integrating sphere for measurement and scanned in two different orientations to subsample different portions of the filter, whereafter results were averaged (e.g., Röttgers and Gehnke ; Stramski et al ). A correction for the pathlength amplification factor was applied to the data (Stramski et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spectral absorption coefficient of particles, a p ( λ ), was determined at 1 nm intervals over the spectral range 300–850 nm for ICESCAPE cruises and 300–800 nm for the MALINA cruise in a dual‐beam spectrophotometer (Lambda 18, Perkin Elmer) equipped with a 15 cm integrating sphere (Labsphere). Filters were placed inside the integrating sphere for measurement and scanned in two different orientations to subsample different portions of the filter, whereafter results were averaged (e.g., Röttgers and Gehnke ; Stramski et al ). A correction for the pathlength amplification factor was applied to the data (Stramski et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filters were placed inside the integrating sphere for measurement and scanned in two different orientations to subsample different portions of the filter, whereafter results were averaged (e.g., Röttgers and Gehnke ; Stramski et al ). A correction for the pathlength amplification factor was applied to the data (Stramski et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, they showed how the transmittance QFT method (as used to determine the a phy (443) and Chla relation by Bricaud et al [24]) tends to overestimate a phy (443) in respect to measurements obtained inside an integrating sphere (as used herein following Röttgers et al [18]). This a problem to be considered when integrating data sets obtained from different cruises and analysed by different methods [71].…”
Section: Environmental and Bio-optical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stramski et al [71] shows how using different methods and path length amplification factors (beta correction) can cause over than 30% differences for the ap measurements. Particularly, they showed how the transmittance QFT method (as used to determine the aphy(443) and Chla relation by Bricaud et al [24]) tends to overestimate aphy(443) in respect to measurements obtained inside an integrating sphere (as used herein following Röttgers et al [18]).…”
Section: Environmental and Bio-optical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in DS2 the spectral nonwater absorption coefficient, a nw ( λ ), was obtained from in situ measurements with an ac‐s instrument (WET Labs) as described in Neukermans et al (). The absorption data in DS3 were obtained from spectrophotometric measurements made on discrete water samples, which provided the component absorption coefficients, a CDOM ( λ ) and ap|λ=anormalpnormalh|λ+anormalNnormalAnormalP|λ, and hence , anormalnnormalw|λ=anormalCnormalDnormalOnormalM|λ+ap|λ (e.g., Mitchell et al, ; Stramski et al, ). With regard to the backscattering coefficient, the ECO BB‐9 and ECO‐VSF sensors (WET Labs) have been used to measure b b ( λ ) in DS2, and Hydroscat‐6 sensors (HOBI Labs) have been used in DS3.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%