2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-1035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of pre-existing astigmatism during cataract surgery: comparison between the effects of opposite clear corneal incisions and a single clear corneal incision

Abstract: Opposite clear cornea incision seems to be a simple, predictable, safe and effective procedure in reducing pre-existing corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery. It has an enhanced effect in correcting astigmatism compared to a single clear cornea incision when using keratometric findings value but not when using refractive data. Future studies are needed to document the long-term effect of OCCI and to evaluate the correlation between incisions of different size and astigmatism correction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
23
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Clear corneal incisions are invasive and produce a stable flattening effect over the long term, 17 and OCCIs have an enhanced effect. 19 In earlier studies of OCCIs, [19][20][21][22] the mean reduction in corneal astigmatism ranged from 0.50 to 2.06 D. Our study concurs with these observations. We saw a mean corneal 20 The mean SIA was 1.66 D in our OCCI group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clear corneal incisions are invasive and produce a stable flattening effect over the long term, 17 and OCCIs have an enhanced effect. 19 In earlier studies of OCCIs, [19][20][21][22] the mean reduction in corneal astigmatism ranged from 0.50 to 2.06 D. Our study concurs with these observations. We saw a mean corneal 20 The mean SIA was 1.66 D in our OCCI group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…17,18 Performing an additional CCI opposite the first CCI to enhance the flattening effect has been reported. [19][20][21][22] This method is called paired opposite clear corneal incisions (OCCIs). We performed a comparative evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism between 3.2 mm OCCI and CCI in cataract patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent designs have overcome this problem and have excellent stability (!4 degrees rotation). 28 In earlier studies of OCCIs, the mean reduction in corneal astigmatism ranged from 0.50 to 2.06 D. [29][30][31][32][33] Mean symmetrically induced astigmatism of 2.25 D was reported by Lever and Dahan, 29 2.10 D by Qammar and Mullaney, 30 1.66 D by Ben Simon and Desatnik, 31 1.75 D by Tadros et al, 32 and 1.60 D by Khokhar et al 33 Differences between studies are the result of the variety of incision lengths and the amount and type of preexisting astigmatism. In a scatter graph of astigmatism changes in our study, there was a more concentrated data set around the origin of the graph postoperatively, indicating better correction of astigmatism; the data were more concentrated in the toric IOL group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[29][30][31][32] The incisions, which are placed on the steep corneal meridian and symmetrically opposed, are designed to flatten the steep meridian. A single clear corneal incision (CCI) will have a local flattening effect on the cornea depending on its location, width, and structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has a larger effect than a single clear corneal incision and can correct more than one dioptre of corneal astigmatism. 13,14 Limbal relaxing incisions, otherwise known as peripheral corneal relaxing incisions, can also be used to correct astigmatism intraoperatively. This technique requires two additional incisions placed in the peripheral cornea along the steepest meridian.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%