1983
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198307000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Spinal Curvatures by Transcutaneous Electrical Muscle Stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spinal deformity located at the opposite side to the stimulated side observed in the experiment is similar to the effects reported by other authors [3,4,8,9,20]. Such deformation was found in monkeys by Bigard et al [4], in rats by Joe [9], in rabbits by Sevastik et al [20] and Herbert and Bobechko [8] (with a similar number of animals as in our experiment) and in cats by Axelgaard et al [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The spinal deformity located at the opposite side to the stimulated side observed in the experiment is similar to the effects reported by other authors [3,4,8,9,20]. Such deformation was found in monkeys by Bigard et al [4], in rats by Joe [9], in rabbits by Sevastik et al [20] and Herbert and Bobechko [8] (with a similar number of animals as in our experiment) and in cats by Axelgaard et al [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In these cases, the resulting deformations were located in the breast segment. The maximum Cobb angle of spinal deformity in the group receiving stimulation for 9 h/day described by Axelgaard et al [3] was 56°, whereas in the experiment of similar duration conducted by Joe [9], it was up to 28°. The maximum spinal deformity in our experiment was 41°, and the daily stimulation shortened to 2 h. Detailed analysis of the muscular fibres of the paravertebral muscles and their metabolism by Bigard et al [4] and Joe [9] indicates the temporary disorders caused by LESS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations