2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Test Cycle Tolerances: Evaluating the Impact on CO2 Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is expected to lead to an increase of the overall CO2 emissions, as already reported in literature for vehicles equipped with conventional powertrains [31,32] This section provides an additional contribution, analyzing the impact of the new TA procedure on a test case vehicle representative of current state of the art of the hybrid technology.…”
Section: Co2 Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, it is expected to lead to an increase of the overall CO2 emissions, as already reported in literature for vehicles equipped with conventional powertrains [31,32] This section provides an additional contribution, analyzing the impact of the new TA procedure on a test case vehicle representative of current state of the art of the hybrid technology.…”
Section: Co2 Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This has been improved in WLTC by normalizing the emissions according to the measured driven distance during the test [26,27]. Another change is through REESS (Rechargeable Electric Energy Storage System) monitoring which is called REESS charge balance (RCB) correction in which the CO 2 emissions are required to be corrected according the amount of energy drawn from the battery during the test cycle [28,29]. This is owing to the fact that the vehicle battery is fully charged at the start of the test and it depletes during the cycle, which means the energy from the battery can be drawn and consumed over the cycle possibly leading to lower CO 2 emissions and better fuel economy; however, this is not always the case in real driving conditions [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported data [136] show that the annual reduction rate of the average CO 2 emissions during the last five years (2011 -2015) is equal to 3.1%. As discussed in [126,137], the 2015 target of 130 gCO 2 /km has been reached already two years in advance by most vehicle manufactures, to an important extent due to the use of test protocol margins [1,58,63,126,138]. Most manufacturers complied with their 2015 targets already in 2013 and trends show that the 95 gCO 2 /km target could be achieved in 2020.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…provisions or interpretations made on various loosely defined boundaries like those applied on the speed profile, the test temperature definition, the calculation of vehicle resistances, the vehicle preparation, etc. [58,63];…”
Section: Structurementioning
confidence: 99%