2021
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of the Gene Defect in Cystic Fibrosis: Is It Too Late for Bone?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…71 In addition to potential direct effects of restoring CFTR function on bone health, indirect benefits may include improved absorption of vitamin D from the gastrointestinal tract, 72 increased exercise capacity, improved nutritional state, and reduced infection and inflammation. 73 Together, these early findings are encouraging and, given the tolerability and safety of modulator therapies, clinical improvements in cystic fibrosisrelated bone disease should be anticipated. However, optimal clinical management for adults receiving modulator therapy with declining bone mineral density and/or osteoporotic fracture remains unclear, and research is needed to clarify whether adjunct use with currently available bone preservation therapies is safe and efficacious.…”
Section: Effects Of Modulators On Cystic Fibrosis-related Bone Diseasementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…71 In addition to potential direct effects of restoring CFTR function on bone health, indirect benefits may include improved absorption of vitamin D from the gastrointestinal tract, 72 increased exercise capacity, improved nutritional state, and reduced infection and inflammation. 73 Together, these early findings are encouraging and, given the tolerability and safety of modulator therapies, clinical improvements in cystic fibrosisrelated bone disease should be anticipated. However, optimal clinical management for adults receiving modulator therapy with declining bone mineral density and/or osteoporotic fracture remains unclear, and research is needed to clarify whether adjunct use with currently available bone preservation therapies is safe and efficacious.…”
Section: Effects Of Modulators On Cystic Fibrosis-related Bone Diseasementioning
confidence: 93%
“…A pilot study demonstrated that weight gain improved bone mineral density and exercise capacity in nine individuals with cystic fibrosis (mean age, 18.6 years; standard deviation, 4.7 years) who were administered ETI compared with cystic fibrosis controls 71 . In addition to potential direct effects of restoring CFTR function on bone health, indirect benefits may include improved absorption of vitamin D from the gastrointestinal tract, 72 increased exercise capacity, improved nutritional state, and reduced infection and inflammation 73 . Together, these early findings are encouraging and, given the tolerability and safety of modulator therapies, clinical improvements in cystic fibrosis‐related bone disease should be anticipated.…”
Section: Cystic Fibrosis‐related Bone Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFTR modulator therapies may improve bone density by targeting dysfunctional CFTR in the bone or by ameliorating other risk factors for CF bone disease [86] . CFTR is expressed in human osteoblasts and CFTR-deficient cells demonstrate increased RANK-L:OPG ratio and reduced prostaglandin E-2 (PGE-2) levels, suggesting tissue-level alteration in bone modeling pathways [87] .…”
Section: Pharmacologic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, application of the C18 corrector to cultured osteoblasts increased RANK-L and PGE-2, suggesting that CFTR modulator therapy may directly treat low BMD in people with CF [88] . CFTR modulator therapy may also indirectly improve bone health by improving nutrient absorption, hypogonadism, and pulmonary disease [86] . Clinical studies of Ivacaftor in adults with CF with at least one copy of the G511D mutation suggest some impact on BMD.…”
Section: Pharmacologic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%