2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8056-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of the lack of commutability between plasmid DNA and genomic DNA for quantification of genetically modified organisms using pBSTopas as a model

Abstract: Plasmid calibrators are increasingly applied for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). To evaluate the commutability between plasmid DNA (pDNA) and genomic DNA (gDNA) as calibrators, a plasmid molecule, pBSTopas, was constructed, harboring a Topas 19/2 event-specific sequence and a partial sequence of the rapeseed reference gene CruA. Assays of the pDNA showed similar limits of detection (five copies for Topas 19/2 and CruA) and quantification (40 copies for Topas 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the discrepancy between experimental and theoretical Cf values, we constructed PCR standard curves (as shown in Figure and Table S2) using genomic DNA templates of each of the eight GM canola events at different concentrations (50.0, 25.0, 5.0, 2.5, 0.5 ng/reaction). We found that the deviations of slopes and intercepts of plasmid and genomic DNA standard curves (Table S2) might cause the difference between the experimental and theoretical Cf values, especially for the deviation of intercepts . For instance, in RF1 event and endogenous PEP gene assays, standard curves between reactions using genomic DNA and pCAN plasmid DNA templates had similar slopes (−3.4471 and −3.4466) but different intercepts of 39.583 and 37.052, the intercept of 2.531 was the mainly origin caused the high Cf value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To assess the discrepancy between experimental and theoretical Cf values, we constructed PCR standard curves (as shown in Figure and Table S2) using genomic DNA templates of each of the eight GM canola events at different concentrations (50.0, 25.0, 5.0, 2.5, 0.5 ng/reaction). We found that the deviations of slopes and intercepts of plasmid and genomic DNA standard curves (Table S2) might cause the difference between the experimental and theoretical Cf values, especially for the deviation of intercepts . For instance, in RF1 event and endogenous PEP gene assays, standard curves between reactions using genomic DNA and pCAN plasmid DNA templates had similar slopes (−3.4471 and −3.4466) but different intercepts of 39.583 and 37.052, the intercept of 2.531 was the mainly origin caused the high Cf value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Compared with the genetic RMs that are commonly used, the genetic RM system established in this study can to some extent address the disadvantages of easy contamination, short preservation time, and inaccurate quantification of plasmid or synthetic DNA. 14,34 Compared with commercial cell lines, 8 this system eliminated the complicated cell line construction process and cell immortalization operation. In addition, the system obtained a genetic reference cell line with the same clear mutation frequency and copy number and convenient DNA extraction, amplification, and detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantages of matrix-based CRMs in GMO quantitative analysis include the narrow dynamic range of quantification, multiple and complex preparation procedures, high cost, and difficulty in obtaining the homogeneous candidate [ 15 , 16 ]. Compared with matrix-based CRMs, plasmid-DNA-based CRMs are good substitutes in GMO analysis since they have a well-characterized transgene sequence and copy number, and they can be easily maintained in and produced from bacterium stocks [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. In the detection of foodborne bacteria and viruses, plasmid-DNA-based CRMs are also widely used instead of inactivated bacteria and viruses [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%