1995
DOI: 10.1253/jcj.59.190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of the QT Interval in Children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Bazett formula overcorrects the QT interval at high heart rates. Pediatric cardiologists who participated in the program used age-and sex-specific criteria using an exponential formula (QT/RR 0.31 ) 21 or Fridericia formula. 22 In the screening program, cardiologists use computer-based QTc values as a reference because all ECG machines used in Japan are generally equipped with a function for automated measurement of QT intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Bazett formula overcorrects the QT interval at high heart rates. Pediatric cardiologists who participated in the program used age-and sex-specific criteria using an exponential formula (QT/RR 0.31 ) 21 or Fridericia formula. 22 In the screening program, cardiologists use computer-based QTc values as a reference because all ECG machines used in Japan are generally equipped with a function for automated measurement of QT intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutoffs used to screen children and adolescents with prolonged QT intervals, corrected according to Fridericia's formula, have previously been reported using automatically measured data for QT and RR intervals (QT/RR data). 9 The accuracy of automatic QTc measurements, however, is questionable in many cases, and should be supplemented by manual readings. 8 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies, the majority of participants were male (8 out of 10, with 3 of these 8 having a 100% male population). One study had a majority of female participants, 18 and 1 study included a 100% female population 24 . The mean age was provided for 5 studies and was within our age range of 14−35 years old 19–21,25,26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…| 1111 lowest R 2 values and was reported to be most accurate in terms of its ability to remove the effects of HR at all HR ranges. [18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27] Notably, Fridericia was the preferred method proposed by all of the cross-sectional studies, and no papers specifically discouraged the use of QTcF. [18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27] Additionally, three studies determined that Framingham was not suitable for use for QT correction in athletes and young people, 19,23,25 and was not specifically recommended by any of the included studies.…”
Section: Comparison Of Qt Interval Correction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation