Correction to: Attention to principles of exercise training: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials in cancers other than breast and prostate

Bland, Kelcey A.; Neil-Sztramko, Sarah; Zadravec, Kendra; Medysky, Mary E.; Kong, Jeffrey; Winters-Stone, Kerri M.; Campbell, Kristin L.

doi:10.1186/s12885-021-09022-w

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 21 out of 28 studies (75%) specified the duration of the major exercise component of the training session (i.e., aerobic‐, resistance‐, concurrent‐training, and others). These findings concur with previous investigations on exercise prescription in all types of cancers or youth mental health 29,30,32 . Compelling evidence demonstrates that manipulating exercise intensity and volume affects the resulting training adaptations (i.e., muscular strength, muscle size, metabolic and cardiovascular health, or motor unit recruitment) in healthy participants and individuals with chronic conditions 75–77 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Any aerobic training provided detailed description of the exercise equipment, progression, whether exercise with previous investigations on exercise prescription in all types of cancers or youth mental health. 29,30,32 Compelling evidence demonstrates that manipulating exercise intensity and volume affects the resulting training adaptations (i.e., muscular strength, muscle size, metabolic and cardiovascular health, or motor unit recruitment) in healthy participants and individuals with chronic conditions. [75][76][77] Therefore, due to inadequate reporting, our findings suggest that certain results should be interpreted cautiously, as the prescribed exercise dose and the actual dose received remains unclear.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Poor content reporting of the FITT components prevents an appropriate interpretation of the dose–response relationship of exercise interventions 30 . All the resistance training interventions fully described all the FITT components.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…26,27 For this purpose, several relevant tools, such as the checklist of exercise prescription components of Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type (FITT) and the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT), have been developed. 26,27 It is worrisome to note, however, that poor content reporting of exercise interventions has been observed in several systematic reviews of rotator cuff disease, cancer, or mental health trials, among others, [28][29][30][31][32] even after the release of the FITT and CERT checklists. Some reports have also suggested potential misreporting in BS clinical trials.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Exercise interventions following bariatric surgery are poorly reported: A systematic review and a call for action

Baena‐Raya,

Martínez‐Rosales,

Ruiz‐González

et al. 2024

Obesity Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryObjectivesThis study assessed the transparency and replicability of exercise‐based interventions following bariatric surgery by evaluating the content reporting of exercise‐based clinical trials.DesignThe study design of the present article is a systematic review.Data sourcesPubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, PsycINFO, and Cochrane were searched from their inception to May 2023.Eligibility criteriaEligible studies were clinical trials including exercise interventions in participants following bariatric surgery. There were 28 unique exercise interventions. Two independent reviewers applied the exercise prescription components of Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type (FITT; four items) and the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT; 19 items). Exercise interventions were organized into four major exercise components: aerobic training, resistance training, concurrent training, and “others.”ResultsThe FITT assessment revealed that 53% of the trials did not report the training intensity, whereas 25% did not indicate the duration of the major exercise component within the training session. The mean CERT score was 5 out of a possible score of 19. No studies reached CERT score >10, while 13 out of the total 19 CERT items were not adequately reported by ≥75% of the studies.ConclusionThis study highlights that the exercise interventions following bariatric surgery are poorly reported, non‐transparent, and generally not replicable. This precludes understanding the dose–response association of exercise and health‐related effects and requires action to improve this scientific field.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%