2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-020-09633-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Identification of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis) chromosomes using BAC-FISH

Abstract: was originally published with incorrect values in Figure 4. The correct Figure 4 is presented below.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we have observed that Ty1/copia-Angela and Ty3/gypsy-Tekay retroelements were dispersed in P. quadrangularis and P. cincinnata chromosomes, although showing more intense labelling at proximal regions. An uneven dispersed distribution was also observed in P. edulis and two other species of the subgenus Passiflora, where terminal or subterminal regions of the chromosome arms are gene-rich, and the proximal regions are gene-poor and consist of dispersed repetitive sequences (Pamponét et al 2019;Sader et al 2019b;Stack et al 2009;Dias et al 2020). This distribution pattern suggest that gene-rich regions, and probably recombination, is more evenly distributed in P. organensis, except in pericentromeric regions, while higher in chromosomal ends of larger genome species, such as P. quadrangularis, P. cincinnata, and P.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we have observed that Ty1/copia-Angela and Ty3/gypsy-Tekay retroelements were dispersed in P. quadrangularis and P. cincinnata chromosomes, although showing more intense labelling at proximal regions. An uneven dispersed distribution was also observed in P. edulis and two other species of the subgenus Passiflora, where terminal or subterminal regions of the chromosome arms are gene-rich, and the proximal regions are gene-poor and consist of dispersed repetitive sequences (Pamponét et al 2019;Sader et al 2019b;Stack et al 2009;Dias et al 2020). This distribution pattern suggest that gene-rich regions, and probably recombination, is more evenly distributed in P. organensis, except in pericentromeric regions, while higher in chromosomal ends of larger genome species, such as P. quadrangularis, P. cincinnata, and P.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In our study, we have seen that some Tekay clusters were present in the last common ancestral among the three species. Apart from methodological differences (we are investigating clusters of TEs, not individual elements), a possible explanation for this discrepancy could be that the authors analysed TEs from gene-rich regions, which are located at chromosomal ends (Sader et al 2019b). In our case, we used elements from the most abundant clusters that may have accumulated in the pericentromeric regions for longer time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ localization of the retrotransposons in pericentromeric regions or dispersed throughout the chromosomes is a common feature of plant genomes of similar sizes, small and large, respectively (Miller et al 1998;Cheng and Murata 2003;Nagaki et al 2004¸ Neumann et al 2011 (Pamponét et al 2019;Sader et al 2019b;Stack et al 2009;Dias et al 2020). This distribution pattern suggest that gene-rich regions, and probably recombination, is more evenly distributed in P. organensis, except in pericentromeric regions, while higher in chromosomal ends of larger genome species, such as P. quadrangularis, P. cincinnata, and P.…”
Section: Such Differences In Percentage Of Te Explains Most Of the DImentioning
confidence: 99%