Correction to: The tragedy of US–Russian relations: NATO centrality and the revisionists’ spiral

Sushentsov, Andrey; Wohlforth, William C.

doi:10.1057/s41311-020-00238-4

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Так, реалисты рассматривают начатые последним руководителем СССР перемены как временное отступление и перегруппировку сил, а не как попытку изменить мир с характерными для него геополитическими принципами [Brooks, Wohlforth 2000]. Они полагают также, что, настаивая на самороспуске НАТО и выступая против расширения западного альянса, Россия руководствовалась принципами наступательного реализма и желанием укрепить свои властные позиции в Европе [Sushentsov, Wohlforth 2020]. Но М.С.…”

Section: основные теоретические подходыunclassified

Russian Foreign Policy: On a Coprehensive Understanding

Tsygankov

Павлович²

2020

Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Meždunar. otnoš.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: основные теоретические подходыunclassified

Russian Foreign Policy: On a Coprehensive Understanding

Tsygankov

Павлович²

2020

Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Meždunar. otnoš.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This aim deals with the configuration of the international order rather than international society. Moscow's preoccupation with defending the autonomy of global international society from perceived Western transgressions (Sakwa 2017: 47) can therefore be thought of as an expression of proceduralism and 'constitutionalism'-an interest in determining who makes the rules rather than what the rules themselves are (Allison 2013: 203;Sokov 2018;Sushentsov and Wohlforth 2020). By contrast, China's preference for the norm of non-interference and its calls for the 'democratization' of international relations are an indication of a conservative and cautious approach to pursuing its 'de-alienation' from international society.…”

Section: Russia China and International Societymentioning

confidence: 99%

Through thick and thin: Russia, China and the future of Eurasian International Society

Paikin

2020

Int Polit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent years have seen Moscow and Beijing driven closer together as their respective relations with Washington have deteriorated. While a normative convergence between Russia and China appears to be underway, there remains a legacy of historical mistrust in addition to potential irritants that could plague their bilateral relationship. Nonetheless, if Western sanctions against Russia and pressure on China continue unabated, they may have little option but to continue their rapprochement. Against this backdrop, this article will explore whether the two countries currently display a 'thin' or 'thick' bilateral relationship, making use of an English School theoretical framework. It will do so by exploring established English School concepts such as pluralism and solidarism and discussing notable literature within the School on contestation in order to derive conclusions regarding the potential future shape of international order in Eurasia.

show abstract

Correction to: The tragedy of US–Russian relations: NATO centrality and the revisionists’ spiral

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Russian Foreign Policy: On a Coprehensive Understanding

Russian Foreign Policy: On a Coprehensive Understanding

Through thick and thin: Russia, China and the future of Eurasian International Society

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About