2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12103-015-9319-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correctional Executives’ Leadership Self-Efficacy and Their Perceptions of Emotional Intelligence

Abstract: Correctional leadership is virtually an unexamined category, lacking literature regarding what is necessary to be a successful correctional executive. This quantitative study involved examining a leadership model of the relationship between emotional intelligence and leader self-efficacy perceptions among correctional executives and senior-level leaders. A convenience sampling of 112 correctional leaders from across the US participated in the study. Participants were asked to complete the WLEIS (Wong & Law Emo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Mayer and Salovey (1997) argued that EI is a set of affective processing capabilities in which greater EI leads to improved ability to interact with others in social situations. Likely due to this relationship between EI and advanced socioemotional functioning, authors have suggested that EI is positively related to various leader attributes such as self-leadership (Houghton, Wu, Godwin, Neck, & Manz, 2012), team performance (Jordan & Troth, 2004), leader self-efficacy (Harper, 2016), and job performance (Joseph, Jin, Newman, & O’Boyle, 2015). Scholars have noted significant implications for counselors in the emerging literature on EI (Constantine & Gainor, 2001; Gutierrez & Mullen, 2016; Gutierrez, Mullen, & Fox, 2017; Martin, Easton, Wilson, Takemoto, & Sullivan, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mayer and Salovey (1997) argued that EI is a set of affective processing capabilities in which greater EI leads to improved ability to interact with others in social situations. Likely due to this relationship between EI and advanced socioemotional functioning, authors have suggested that EI is positively related to various leader attributes such as self-leadership (Houghton, Wu, Godwin, Neck, & Manz, 2012), team performance (Jordan & Troth, 2004), leader self-efficacy (Harper, 2016), and job performance (Joseph, Jin, Newman, & O’Boyle, 2015). Scholars have noted significant implications for counselors in the emerging literature on EI (Constantine & Gainor, 2001; Gutierrez & Mullen, 2016; Gutierrez, Mullen, & Fox, 2017; Martin, Easton, Wilson, Takemoto, & Sullivan, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with high EI were found to be optimistic, warm and empathic, and to possess a consistently high level of self-esteem (Song et al, 2010). Furthermore, a significant positive correlation was found between the level of EI and self-efficacy among teachers, physicians, social workers, and businesspeople (Harper, 2016;Hen & Goroshit, 2011). Goleman (1998) proposed a theory of performance that builds on the basic EI model as a means to predict personal effectiveness at work and in leadership.…”
Section: Emotional Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…У них отсутствует чувство социальной изолированности и отчужденности (низкое значение шкалы «социальная отчужденность» 182-Sc 1A ), несмотря на специфические условия профессиональной деятельности, что является признаком развитой эмпатии. По мнению исследователей, это важнейшая социальная способность, включающая понимание чувств людей, учет различных точек зрения, владение искусством сотрудничества, разрешения конфликтов и нахождения компромиссов (Harper, 2016;Гоулман, 2017).…”
Section: построение модели психологической готовности к управленческоunclassified
“…), вопрос о руководстве исправительными учреждениями в современных условиях, об эффективности этой деятельности, на наш взгляд, насколько позволяет судить анализ литературы, мало изучен и требует специального внимания исследователей. Это объясняет отсутствие развернутого анализа литературы, в том числе и зарубежной, касающегося руководства в организации данного типа (Harper, 2016;Бовин, 2018). Существуют при этом работы, демонстрирующие злоупотребление властью в пенитенциарном контексте , что актуально и для российской пенитенциарной системы и требует глубокой научной разработки.…”
unclassified