1981
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.23.5797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrections to scaling and surface specific heat of confined helium

Abstract: In earlier work by Chen and Gasparini it was found that leading-order finite-size scaling for the specific heat of helium confined to films and pores did not seem to hold. We present here an analysis which includes correction-to-scaling terms. We do this in two ways: First, we use equations for the shift and value of the specific-heat maximum as suggested by Fisher. Secondly, we show that a bulk-plus-surface specific-heat model yields very similar equations for the shift and maximum, and in addition suggests a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion was based on an analysis which demanded scaling of these data together with data for unsaturated films of helium. Further, the Nuclepore data yielded a scaling exponent much less than n when fitted to a pure power law for the scaling function [17]. If one does not impose these constraints, and one ignores the data for 300 Å confinement, which are, in fact, the least precise, then the Nuclepore results are not inconsistent with the present results.…”
Section: Sarabjit Mehta and Francis M Gasparinisupporting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion was based on an analysis which demanded scaling of these data together with data for unsaturated films of helium. Further, the Nuclepore data yielded a scaling exponent much less than n when fitted to a pure power law for the scaling function [17]. If one does not impose these constraints, and one ignores the data for 300 Å confinement, which are, in fact, the least precise, then the Nuclepore results are not inconsistent with the present results.…”
Section: Sarabjit Mehta and Francis M Gasparinisupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Also, A͞a 2337 J͞mol K is the ratio of leading amplitude and exponent of C͑t,`͒; see Gasparini and Gaeta [14]. Equation (3) has the correct limit expected on a basis of a bulk-plus-surface division of the free energy [4,17], i.e., the surface specific heat. Also, as y becomes small, it has the correct dependence expected on the basis that C͑t, L͒ becomes a constant.…”
Section: Sarabjit Mehta and Francis M Gasparinimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,20 We find that our present data for T c are not precise enough to address the points raised in Refs. 18 and 20 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Our present calculation does not yet explain the detailed L dependence of the height of the specific-heat maximum. 5 This may be due to the multimode problem 11 that one encounters in the crossover to the bulk behavior below 7\.…”
Section: F-[r-t C (L)]/t C (°O) Rather Than On T =*[T-t C (Oo)]/t C (mentioning
confidence: 98%