Corrective and Preventive Action Plan (CAPA) for Disputes in Construction Projects: A Norwegian Perspective

Abstract

The consensus in the Norwegian construction industry is that the projects are characterized by conflicts. Because unresolved disputes that reach courts take time and resources to be solved, this leads to lost productivity and high costs for all stakeholders. Of the root causes of conflicts identified previously, tender specification and contract understanding were the most significant issues. To expand on previous findings, a qualitative analysis of 58 formal, semi-structured interviews was conducted to determine whether personal characteristics and types of contracts presented conflicts. Interviews were conducted with contractors, public clients, consultants, academics, and lawyers. Data were analyzed using NVIVO 12.0 following specific relevant themes and thematic maps. Corrective and preventive actions included the development of a new method to produce better-prepared tender documents, knowledge building in contract management, training to ensure better communication and dialogue between client and contractor, trust-building, dispute resolution along the way, and avoid awarding contracts at the lowest price or the use of a hybrid model. Improved routines may drive costs down, and cooperation and new forms of tendering and contracting could be the key to prevent and minimize disputes in Norway.

Construction Contracts Quality Assessment from the Point of View of Contractor and Customer

“…Clear responsibility of the contractor and the customer for improper performance of contractual obligations [85,86] Construction contracts were evaluated based on expert assessment, after the significance of the quality assurance criteria had been established. Two expert panels were used to determine the significance of the quality assurance criteria.…”

“…The causes of disputes in a construction project range from a lack of detail in the design of the structure and inadequate risk assessment when bidding for construction work, to poor communication between customers and contractors, with each possible cause having a different degree of severity. A research study in the Norwegian construction sector has identified the major risks in project management [85]. Disputes between clients and contractors are most likely to arise and have a negative impact on project performance due to poor communication and cooperation.…”

ÖNORM B 2203-1 as a Supplement to FIDIC Emerald Book in Conventional Tunnel Construction

“…Given the importance of GBR management during construction, the Emerald Book necessitates an essential role for Engineers who oversee the execution of work on the site [46]. Since large-scale construction projects are generally characterised by conflicts [88], and Engineers play a central role in resolving disputes between parties, their position requires high impartiality. The core functions of the Engineer include assessing the Contractor's execution readiness planning, providing general construction supervision, and supervising and recording excavation work.…”