2012
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660643.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrective Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The 'elements of liability under corrective justice can be explicated only in terms of concepts whose normative force applies simultaneously to both parties'. 42 Unlike distributive justice, corrective justice takes the parties to be equal. For corrective justice 'liability involves a conception of fairness that recognizes the equal normative status of the two parties and treats their normative positions as mirror images of each other'.…”
Section: Distributive and Corrective Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'elements of liability under corrective justice can be explicated only in terms of concepts whose normative force applies simultaneously to both parties'. 42 Unlike distributive justice, corrective justice takes the parties to be equal. For corrective justice 'liability involves a conception of fairness that recognizes the equal normative status of the two parties and treats their normative positions as mirror images of each other'.…”
Section: Distributive and Corrective Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8;Katz 2014;Shavell 2004, pt. III), solidarity and collaboration (Jamin 2001;Lurger 1998;Markovits 2004Markovits , 1421, corrective justice (Gordley 2001;Weinrib 2012), or tradition (Zimmermann 2011).…”
Section: Contract Law and The Right To Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Weinrib himself embraces the argument of circularity, stating that it 'is a consequence of the self-contained nature of intelligibility.' 53 Such formalist accounts of law are almost exclusively focused on questions of private law, 54 in which questions can be framed within the Aristotelean account of corrective justice, with its pseudomathematical structures. On this view, questions of distributive justice, according to the celebrated Aristotelean dichotomy lie outside law in the central formalist account.…”
Section: Multiple Choice Tests and The Nature Of Legal Truth: Bivalenmentioning
confidence: 99%