2017
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxx094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correctness of Self-Reported Task Durations: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The correctness of self-reported task durations is, at the best, moderate at the individual level, and this may present a significant problem when using self-reports in task-based assessment of individual job exposures. However, average self-reports at the group level appear reasonably correct and may thus be a viable method in studies addressing, for instance, the relative occurrence of tasks in a production system. Due to the disparity of studies, definite conclusions on the quantitative effect on agreement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering Aspergillus section Fumigati, besides its clinical relevance [ 51 , 52 ], this species was observed to be predominant and detected in several sampling sites, only by molecular tools, in other critical Portuguese occupational environments [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 53 , 54 ]. Furthermore, both Aspergillus sections detected are representative of harmful fungal species, and their presence requires the implementation of corrective measures according to the American Industrial Hygiene Association [ 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering Aspergillus section Fumigati, besides its clinical relevance [ 51 , 52 ], this species was observed to be predominant and detected in several sampling sites, only by molecular tools, in other critical Portuguese occupational environments [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 53 , 54 ]. Furthermore, both Aspergillus sections detected are representative of harmful fungal species, and their presence requires the implementation of corrective measures according to the American Industrial Hygiene Association [ 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupational research and practice has a long-standing interest in the use of time ( Bauman et al , 2019 ). Examples of exposures include time spent in different work tasks ( Mathiassen et al , 2005 ; Svendsen et al , 2005 ; Lewné et al , 2017 ; Notø et al , 2017 ; Pulido et al , 2017 ), in hazardous environments ( Fruin et al , 2004 ; Stewart et al , 2010 ), on different physical activities ( Thorp et al , 2012 ; Rasmussen et al , 2018 ; Gupta et al , 2019 ), and in specific postures ( Mathiassen et al , 2014 ; Wahlström et al , 2016 ; Palm et al , 2018 ).…”
Section: Time Use In Occupational Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, average self-reports at the group level appear reasonably correct and may thus be a viable method in studies addressing, for instance, the relative occurrence of tasks in a production system. A decision is needed to be made for when to apply or avoid self-reports to measure task durations, depending on study purpose and occupational setting [69]. In Sweden some of the methods that are used include the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) [70], Key Indicator Method (KIM) [65], the Risk management Assessment tool for Manual handling Proactively (RAMP) [66] and the Quick Exposure Check (QEC) [71].…”
Section: Physical Work Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%