2017
DOI: 10.14295/ras.v31i4.28910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlação entre dados de perfilagem geofísica e potencial de bombeamento de poços em litotipos da Formação Cauê no sudoeste do Quadrilátero Ferrífero, MG

Abstract: O presente artigo consiste em uma integração litológica-hidrológica com base em dados de perfilagem geofísica realizada em poços tubulares profundos. Seu principal objetivo é a comparação e definição dos litotipos mais favoráveis para prospecção de água subterrânea na área de estudo. A metodologia envolveu a análise dos perfis geofísicos e sua interpretação em conjunto com a litologia e valores de vazão específica de cada poço.  No caso dos litotipos do Aquífero Cauê, as litologias brandas tendem a ter mais ág… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a marked difference in permeability is observed in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the lamination, with the one along the bedding being approximately three times higher than the orthogonal direction. Dantas et al (2017) subdivided the Cauê Aquifer into hematite, itabirite, clayey itabirite, and carbonatic itabirite, with each of the lithologies separated into soft and compact. In this study, the soft hematites were more favorable for the presence of water, followed by the soft itabirites.…”
Section: Hydrogeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a marked difference in permeability is observed in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the lamination, with the one along the bedding being approximately three times higher than the orthogonal direction. Dantas et al (2017) subdivided the Cauê Aquifer into hematite, itabirite, clayey itabirite, and carbonatic itabirite, with each of the lithologies separated into soft and compact. In this study, the soft hematites were more favorable for the presence of water, followed by the soft itabirites.…”
Section: Hydrogeologymentioning
confidence: 99%