2012
DOI: 10.4321/s0004-05922012000400007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlação entre digestibilidade e comportamento ingestivo de novilhas suplementadas a pasto

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direct correlation between feeding and the ingestion of cell wall justifies the small differences in average forage NDF (643.57 g kg -1 of dry matter [DM]) and average forage DM between treatments (Table 1) (Carlotto et al, 2010). It is of note that a study found that concentrate intake was negatively correlated with rumination time (Pizzuti et al, 2012;Santana et al, 2012), and the latter was not correlated with weight gain and feed conversion (Santana et al, 2013). The time spent ruminating and at each feeding station (385 and 42 min day -1 , respectively) were not affected by the level of The decrease in grazing time did not affect average daily weight gain because steers consumed less forage but more concentrate (Goes et al, 2010;Sales et al, 2011;Benatti et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The direct correlation between feeding and the ingestion of cell wall justifies the small differences in average forage NDF (643.57 g kg -1 of dry matter [DM]) and average forage DM between treatments (Table 1) (Carlotto et al, 2010). It is of note that a study found that concentrate intake was negatively correlated with rumination time (Pizzuti et al, 2012;Santana et al, 2012), and the latter was not correlated with weight gain and feed conversion (Santana et al, 2013). The time spent ruminating and at each feeding station (385 and 42 min day -1 , respectively) were not affected by the level of The decrease in grazing time did not affect average daily weight gain because steers consumed less forage but more concentrate (Goes et al, 2010;Sales et al, 2011;Benatti et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Digestibility can be influenced by several factors such as the com-justment of animal feeding management to obtain better productive performance. However, associations between behavioral and metabolic variables have been found in research discussions, most of the times without the proper scientific basis for these correlations (Santana Júnior et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%