2018
DOI: 10.53591/eoug.v1i1.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlación entre biotipo facial clínico y cefalométrico como elementos de diagnóstico en Ortodoncia

Abstract: Introducción: Existe varios métodos para determinar el biotipo facial de un individuo como el análisis clínico y cefalométrico que sirven como elementos de diagnóstico en ortodoncia. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la correlación existente entre el análisis cefalométrico según Ricketts para establecer el biotipo facial, con las medidas obtenidas en una fotografía frontal según Martin & Saller. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional, correlacional y descriptivo. Se estudiaron 61 ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, we worked with a sample size of 244 participants, similar to previous studies, although there is no study to correlate these analyses. Some results in the literature have described a high level of agreement between cephalometric and photographic analyses (76.5%) ( 14 ), while other studies report little coincidence between the two analyses (k=-0.61) ( 20 , 21 ). These latter results coincide with those of our study, in which we found a coincidence of 68.2% in mesofacial, 10.4% in dolichofacial and 0% in brachyfacial biotypes, with a low weighted kappa value (0.020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For this study, we worked with a sample size of 244 participants, similar to previous studies, although there is no study to correlate these analyses. Some results in the literature have described a high level of agreement between cephalometric and photographic analyses (76.5%) ( 14 ), while other studies report little coincidence between the two analyses (k=-0.61) ( 20 , 21 ). These latter results coincide with those of our study, in which we found a coincidence of 68.2% in mesofacial, 10.4% in dolichofacial and 0% in brachyfacial biotypes, with a low weighted kappa value (0.020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%