Correlación y concordancia de la autoclinimetría en artritis reumatoide: revisión sistemática de la literatura y metanálisis

Amaya-Amaya, Jenny; Torralvo-Morato, G.; Calixto, Omar-Javier; Calderón-Rojas, Rolando; Caro-Moreno, Julián; Domínguez, A. Rodríguez; Mantilla, Rubén-Darío; Anaya, Juan-Manuel; Rojas-Villarraga, Adriana

doi:10.1016/s0121-8123(13)70010-0

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 116 publications

(135 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among them, clinical indexes that combine physical examination, questionnaires, inflammatory markers, or diagnostics images aim to create scores that grant physicians the ability to take decisions based on reproducible measures. These measures should be able to reach an objective assessment about the disease's activity degree, the functional impact, and the patient's quality of life in different stages of its illness [4]. All together, these measures are known as clinimetrics.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement of Disease Activity in Ecuadorian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Does RAPID3 Correlate with Traditional Indexes?

Zurita

Iglesias

Vanegas

et al. 2019

The Scientific World Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. The aim of this study is to demonstrate if routine assessment of patient index data 3 has a correlation with disease’s activity as much as disease activity score 28, clinical disease activity index, and simplified disease activity index in Ecuadorian patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen in Unidad de Enfermedades Reumáticas y Autoinmunes [UNERA] from December 2016 to December 2017. Methods. This is a retrospective study in 200 patients that fulfill the American College of Rheumatology 2010 criteria for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. The patients were evaluated from December 2016 to December 2017. Descriptive analyses were carried out, also Pearson correlation was used, and, to give a better clinical significance, a chi-square test was conducted. Whenever assumptions of chi-square test were violated, a Fisher’s exact test was reported. Results. RAPID3 correlated best with DAS28 (r.83, p < 0.001), followed by CDAI (r.80, p < 0.001) and then SDAI (r.77, p < 0.001). Conclusion. RAPID3 is a questionnaire that only takes 10 seconds to calculate and correlates in a significant way with traditional clinical measures that require more time to perform, saving time in busy health facilities.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement of Disease Activity in Ecuadorian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Does RAPID3 Correlate with Traditional Indexes?

Zurita

Iglesias

Vanegas

et al. 2019

The Scientific World Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As far as we know, in Latin America, the only available study belongs to Medeiros et al ., which assessed the concordance and interchangeability of different clinimetric indices . In Colombia, research on this topic has been conducted in the areas of quality of life and self‐reported outcome measures, where there is a lack of clinimetric knowledge at the local level. For these reasons, we decided to determine the correlation and concordance between different clinimetric indices in RA patients from two high‐complexity reference centers in northwestern Colombia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Concordance and correlation of activity indices in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in northwestern Colombia: A cross‐sectional study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nonetheless, the challenges for a medical team (MT) that is assessing patients through clinimetric measurements during clinical visits include time constraints, limited health care access, nonadherence to treatment plans, and other barriers that often hinder a thorough evaluation of these measurements 13,14 . In this scenario, these tools are not used by the patient who is the main person affected by the disease, but are, instead, handled by various health professionals.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To address this issue, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were introduced. PROM is defined as a self-administered measurement instrument that objectively assesses the disease 14,15 . This instrument offers patients an active role in managing their condition.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison and Influence of a Multicomponent Educational Program on the Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Group of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Santos-Moreno,

Rodríguez-Vargas,

Rodríguez-Florido

et al. 2024

J Clin Rheumatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that affects different areas of the patient's body. Patient education and health literacy is essential for them to participate actively in follow-up. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess differences between clinimetric measurements done by a medical team and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in RA and understand the impact of patient education strategies in order to identify differences between RA assessment methods. Methods This is a longitudinal cohort study. It included adult patients with RA and access to digital tools. These were divided into 3 groups by type of education. Group 1 included patients who participated in a multicomponent RA educational program. Group 2 did not have this multicomponent RA education. Group 3 did not receive any education. The 3 groups performed PROMs. Disease activity scales, functional class, and quality of life were measured. Univariate and bivariate analysis (χ2 and Wilcoxon for paired data) were done. Results Twenty-eight patients were included in group 1, 26 in group 2, and 37 in group 3. All were women. In group 1, there were no significant differences in clinimetrics between the medical team and patient's PROMs except for fatigue. In group 2 and group 3, significant differences were found. The RAPID3 and PAS variables did not show significant differences when analyzed by intervention subgroups. Conclusions This study shows no differences between clinimetrics/PROMs for patients with a high-level education on RA and physicians. On the other hand, when patient did not have any RA education, the clinimetric results differed from physician measurement.

show abstract

Correlación y concordancia de la autoclinimetría en artritis reumatoide: revisión sistemática de la literatura y metanálisis

Cited by 6 publications

References 116 publications

Measurement of Disease Activity in Ecuadorian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Does RAPID3 Correlate with Traditional Indexes?

Measurement of Disease Activity in Ecuadorian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Does RAPID3 Correlate with Traditional Indexes?

Concordance and correlation of activity indices in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in northwestern Colombia: A cross‐sectional study

Comparison and Influence of a Multicomponent Educational Program on the Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Group of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About