1970
DOI: 10.2307/2258284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlated Changes in Plant Size and Number in Plant Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
248
6
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
16
248
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Once at or near the boundary line, stands typically begin to 'self-thin', becoming less dense through mortality of weak or suppressed trees that are out-competed for light and nutrients by dominant and co-dominant trees. Historically, researchers have hypothesized that the slope of the boundary line should be )3 ⁄ 2, a geometric relationship between the two variables with biomass (a cubic measure) on the y-axis vs. density (a squared measure) on the x-axis (White & Harper 1970). Accumulating empirical evidence and theoretical derivations invoking allometric scaling relationships now suggest that the slope of this line may be closer to )4 ⁄ 3, conforming to the widely reported population density-mass ¾ relationship, once the axes are inverted (West, Brown & Enquist 1997;Farrell-Gray & Gotelli 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once at or near the boundary line, stands typically begin to 'self-thin', becoming less dense through mortality of weak or suppressed trees that are out-competed for light and nutrients by dominant and co-dominant trees. Historically, researchers have hypothesized that the slope of the boundary line should be )3 ⁄ 2, a geometric relationship between the two variables with biomass (a cubic measure) on the y-axis vs. density (a squared measure) on the x-axis (White & Harper 1970). Accumulating empirical evidence and theoretical derivations invoking allometric scaling relationships now suggest that the slope of this line may be closer to )4 ⁄ 3, conforming to the widely reported population density-mass ¾ relationship, once the axes are inverted (West, Brown & Enquist 1997;Farrell-Gray & Gotelli 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study adds to the small number of reports (White & Harper 1970, Bazzaz & Harper 1976, Malmberg & Smith 1982, White 1985 which suggest that it can be applied to mixed communities. Unlike most of the latter studies, which have examined experimental communities, this study shows that it applies to natural mixed communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This was intended to indicate only proportional differences, not absolute volumes. For practical reasons, such indirect estimates of size have normally been used in weight/density studies with woody plants (e.g., White & Harper 1970, Gibson & Good 1986.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A description of the distribution of sizes is a common starting point for many demographic studies (e.g. [1][2][3]). This is especially the case for plants, where size distributions are often considered to convey information regarding the stage of development of a stand or the processes occurring within a population [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly likely to be the case for light competition among vascular plants, where taller stems capture a greater proportion of available radiation and determine access for those beneath [18]. As larger individuals can thereby maintain higher growth rates, incipient bimodality will be reinforced [12], at least until light deprivation causes mortality among smaller individuals [1]. Stand development models are able to generate bimodal patterns when resources for growth become limited [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%