2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.153106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlated metals and theLDA+Umethod

Abstract: While LDA+U method is well established for strongly correlated materials with well localized orbitals, its application to weakly correlated metals is questionable. By extending the LDA Stoner approach onto LDA+U, we show that LDA+U enhances the Stoner factor, while reducing the density of states. Arguably the most important correlation effects in metals, fluctuation-induced mass renormalization and suppression of the Stoner factor, are missing from LDA+U. On the other hand, for moderately correlated metals LDA… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
224
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 406 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
224
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in an inaccurate description of relative energies, magnetic ground states, and electronic structure, and may even convert what should be an insulator to a metal. For such materials the many electrons in partially filled d or f orbitals are inherently localized on each metal atom and by introducing the on-site Coulomb repulsion U, applied to localized electrons such as 3d or 4f , i.e., a DFT+U approach, results are improved [55][56][57][58]. Two commonly used methods for treating strongly correlated electron materials, are through empirical fitting or constrained DFT calculations [59][60][61][62].…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in an inaccurate description of relative energies, magnetic ground states, and electronic structure, and may even convert what should be an insulator to a metal. For such materials the many electrons in partially filled d or f orbitals are inherently localized on each metal atom and by introducing the on-site Coulomb repulsion U, applied to localized electrons such as 3d or 4f , i.e., a DFT+U approach, results are improved [55][56][57][58]. Two commonly used methods for treating strongly correlated electron materials, are through empirical fitting or constrained DFT calculations [59][60][61][62].…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 The double-counting correction term Ē ee ͓n ͔, on the other hand, is more arbitrary and is one of the largest problems in the LDA+ U approach. 44,45,67,[70][71][72][73] Most frequently Ē ee is taken as the following function of the local occupation numbers n :…”
Section: ͑20͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of precisely defining DC is hard to solve in the framework of conventional DFT. 44,45 Indeed, DFT is not an orbitally resolved theory and furthermore the LDA/GGA does not have a diagrammatic interpretation ͑like simple Hartree-Fock͒ which would allow to subtract the corresponding terms from the DMFT many-body correction. Simply substracting the matrix elements of V H and V xc in the correlated orbital subset C from the KS Green's function to which the many-body self-energy is applied to is not a physically reasonable strategy.…”
Section: Double-counting Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%