2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlated neural activity as the driving force for functional changes in auditory cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Narrowband noise exposure (7 kHz) resulted in unilateral TTS and tinnitus in the same animals that also underwent simultaneous recordings from DCN (Koehler and Shore 2013b). In A1, increased SFRs following noise exposure in cats (Eggermont 2007;Komiya and Eggermont 2000), a documented neural physiological correlate of tinnitus (reviewed by Eggermont 2015), were significantly increased only in the tinnitus bands (Ͻ12 kHz) compared with sham and noise-exposed animals that did not show evidence of tinnitus. A1 SFRs outside the tinnitus bands (Ͼ12 kHz) did not show significant increases in any group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Narrowband noise exposure (7 kHz) resulted in unilateral TTS and tinnitus in the same animals that also underwent simultaneous recordings from DCN (Koehler and Shore 2013b). In A1, increased SFRs following noise exposure in cats (Eggermont 2007;Komiya and Eggermont 2000), a documented neural physiological correlate of tinnitus (reviewed by Eggermont 2015), were significantly increased only in the tinnitus bands (Ͻ12 kHz) compared with sham and noise-exposed animals that did not show evidence of tinnitus. A1 SFRs outside the tinnitus bands (Ͼ12 kHz) did not show significant increases in any group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although cases of a disruption of seizure inhibition by callosotomy have also been reported (Spencer et al, 1984; Ferbert et al, 1992; Netz et al, 1995), this effect is not as profound as the disruption of the interhemispheric spread of seizures (Bloom and Hynd, 2005). Assuming that it is hypersynchronous firing of neurons in the auditory cortex that represents the neurophysiological correlate of tinnitus (Eggermont and Roberts, 2004; Eggermont, 2007) and that the default transcallosal influence is mainly excitatory, the CC may well facilitate the development and maintenance of tinnitus. The synchronous activity of a population of single units in one hemisphere may be facilitated by the excitatory transcallosal inputs it receives and may in turn facilitate the emergence of one or more descendant synchronized populations via its callosal projection onto the auditory cortex of the respective contralateral hemisphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the tuning shift itself does not represent the tinnitus percept, the shift likely does signal enhanced input via lateral connections to tonotopic regions where tinnitus sounds are generated. Input conveyed by lateral connections (which are known to be highly plastic) could be a driving force for enhanced neural synchrony in the affected cortical regions (Eggermont 2007). One mechanism contributing to synchronous network activity may be homeostatic plasticity, which adjusts neural firing thresholds to preserve spiking rates when other sources of input are lost (Turrigiano 2007).…”
Section: Mechanism Of Tinnitus and Rimentioning
confidence: 99%