2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1nr07732e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlated organic–inorganic motion enhances stability and charge carrier lifetime in mixed halide perovskites

Abstract: Organic cations are believed to have little influence on charge carrier lifetime in hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites. Experiments defy this expectation. We consider formamidinium lead iodide (FAPbI3) doping with and without...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The projected density of states (PDOS) shows that the I and Pb atomic orbitals dominate the VBM and CBM, which are separated by a wide bandgap of 1.37 eV, agreeing with the experimental value (1.47 eV) and our previous works. , Therefore, Pb and I make the major and direct contribution to the NAC and lead to nonradiative electron–hole recombination. By contrast, the FA cation does not constitute the band edge states and indirectly affects the NAC via interacting with the electric field they created and correlated inorganic–organic motion. , This analysis is corroborated by the component-resolved band structure and charge densities of the VBM and CBM (Figure S1). Both the VBM and CBM are located at the Γ-point, which are mainly supported by the I and Pb atoms, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The projected density of states (PDOS) shows that the I and Pb atomic orbitals dominate the VBM and CBM, which are separated by a wide bandgap of 1.37 eV, agreeing with the experimental value (1.47 eV) and our previous works. , Therefore, Pb and I make the major and direct contribution to the NAC and lead to nonradiative electron–hole recombination. By contrast, the FA cation does not constitute the band edge states and indirectly affects the NAC via interacting with the electric field they created and correlated inorganic–organic motion. , This analysis is corroborated by the component-resolved band structure and charge densities of the VBM and CBM (Figure S1). Both the VBM and CBM are located at the Γ-point, which are mainly supported by the I and Pb atoms, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…By contrast, the FA cation does not constitute the band edge states and indirectly affects the NAC via interacting with the electric field they created and correlated inorganic−organic motion. 33,34 This analysis is corroborated by the component-resolved band structure and charge densities of the VBM and CBM (Figure S1). Both the VBM and CBM are located at the Γ-point, which are mainly supported by the I and Pb atoms, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the atomic motion of Pb and Br atoms other than the interstitial bromine decrease in the Br i and Br i – systems and increase in the Br i + system compared to the case for MAPbBr 3 , because the negative interstitial bromine can stabilize the inorganic Br–Pb lattice; neutral interstitial bromine has little influence on it, whereas the positive interstitial bromine repels with Pb and causes the strong fluctuations of inorganic Br–Pb lattice. Overall, the correlated organic–inorganic motions make the atomic motions decrease as Br i + > Br i > Br i – > MAPbBr 3 . , The motion of neutral interstitial bromine is smaller than that of charged interstitial bromine ions, suggesting that the faster migrations of bromine ions than bromine atoms. In general, the stronger atomic fluctuation is, the faster decoherence happens and the larger NA coupling presents. The two factors are opposite to each on affecting charge dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overall, the correlated organic−inorganic motions make the atomic motions decrease as Br i + > Br i > Br i − > MAPbBr 3 . 48,49 The motion of neutral interstitial bromine is smaller than that of charged interstitial bromine ions, suggesting that the faster migrations of bromine ions than bromine atoms. 50−54 In general, the stronger atomic fluctuation is, the faster decoherence happens and the larger NA coupling presents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%