2020
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2020.1714521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlates of Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practice Among MSW Students Preparing for Direct Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have not been specific studies examining the association between psychology students' perceptions, exposure to EBP and EBTs related to the training program, and attitudes towards EBPP. Nevertheless, studies with social work students [26], nurses [27], and mental health professionals [28,29] found that previous knowledge and exposure to EBP were positively associated with the attitude toward s the EBPP process. This result was consistent with the current studies: students who had been adequately trained and exposed to EBP and EBTs Additionally, the discovery that psychology students had more favorable attitudes toward EBPPs than they had ever encountered suggests the importance of the depth of exposure to EBPPs and EBTs for influencing attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have not been specific studies examining the association between psychology students' perceptions, exposure to EBP and EBTs related to the training program, and attitudes towards EBPP. Nevertheless, studies with social work students [26], nurses [27], and mental health professionals [28,29] found that previous knowledge and exposure to EBP were positively associated with the attitude toward s the EBPP process. This result was consistent with the current studies: students who had been adequately trained and exposed to EBP and EBTs Additionally, the discovery that psychology students had more favorable attitudes toward EBPPs than they had ever encountered suggests the importance of the depth of exposure to EBPPs and EBTs for influencing attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This book sees EBP as an “intervention” that has convincing research evidence from “controlled trials” (p. ⅸ), which could garner objections from some (e.g., Thyer & Pignotti, 2011). To subdue confusion among students and social workers concerning terminology, there have been efforts to articulate that EBP refers to two different constructs (Oh et al, 2020; Rubin & Bellamy, 2012; Thyer & Pignotti, 2011). The definition in the preface covers only one, what could be called the research-supported intervention or empirically supported treatment (Thyer & Pignotti, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent such a misconception, the author could have amplified the portion that talks about the EBP process model available in literature (Rubin & Bellamy, 2012; Sackett et al, 1996). Distinguishing between these two constructs of EBP would offer novel insights into the barriers MSW students would encounter when implementing either model when delivering services based on tenets of EBP (Oh et al, 2020). In other words, more weight could be given to the EBP process model in conjunction with hundreds of research-supported treatments highlighted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%