2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlating Facial Fractures and Cranial Injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
73
4
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
14
73
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous reports [25][26][27][28]. We found associated injuries including intracranial hemorrhage (16.4%), skull fractures (23.7%), and spinal fractures (12.1%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar to previous reports [25][26][27][28]. We found associated injuries including intracranial hemorrhage (16.4%), skull fractures (23.7%), and spinal fractures (12.1%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…25 In agreement with a study by Pappachan and Alexander, we observed that CSF rhinorrhoea was nearly twice as frequent as CSF otorrhoea. 27 This may be explained by the fact that anterior Cranial base is relatively closer to midfacial structures and has more sutural connection with midfacial bones compared to the middle cranial base. Thus, the chance of anterior cranial base fracture and resulting CSF rhinorrhoea is expected to be higher.…”
Section: Graph 2: Distribution Of Glasgow Coma Score (Gcs) Of the Patmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some investigators have simply classified facial bone fractures as mandibular, maxillary, or zygomatic, while other researchers have used a very complex classification system. In the same way, a variety of definitions and classifications for head injuries and the etiologies of trauma could be found in the literature [1][2][3]. In our study, similar to prior studies, we defined a classification system for the pattern of facial and head injuries and also for the etiologies of trauma and analyzed the data accordingly.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 80%