2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11015-018-0604-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlating Hardness and Welding Dilution with the Abrasion Mass Loss of Hardfacings Welded with Different Currents and Polarities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VB hardfacing shows the martenasitic formation (Figure 7) and average hardness value of 526–544 HV, it might be due to rich percentage of C and Cr in the hardfacing. Similar findings were also reported by Oo et al., 32 due to the formation of needle-like martenasitic phases in the weld zone. The LH550 hardfacing shows the highest value of microhardness (722–770 HV) among all the overlays.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The VB hardfacing shows the martenasitic formation (Figure 7) and average hardness value of 526–544 HV, it might be due to rich percentage of C and Cr in the hardfacing. Similar findings were also reported by Oo et al., 32 due to the formation of needle-like martenasitic phases in the weld zone. The LH550 hardfacing shows the highest value of microhardness (722–770 HV) among all the overlays.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) [14,[20][21][22][23] Submerged arc welding (SAW) [14,[24][25][26][27] ~60-65 ~95-99 ~15-30 ~30-50…”
Section: Arc Weldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buffer layers are usually advisable when depositing hard and brittle alloys, like chrome carbide, to soft substrates, like mild steel [49]. A range of buffer layer materials have been studied [26,87,88]. A study on hardfacing with and without a buffer layer reported lower bond strength between deposits and substrate in the case of hardfacing without using a buffer layer [82].…”
Section: Buffer Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in hardness are due to two competing factors: there is more dilution by the buffer layer without added powder, which could by itself lead to lower hardness, but the powder additions slowed the cooling rate, and this contributed to more austenite phase formation in the hardfaced layer. This second factor dominates giving more retained austenite and this decreased the hardness because austenite is soft and ductile with low hardness [46,47]. Therefore, hardness profiles of single layer hardfacing with added metal powder were below single layer hardfacing without powder.…”
Section: Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%