Proceedings of the Fourth Social Media Mining for Health Applications (#SMM4H) Workshop &Amp; Shared Task 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w19-3210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlating Twitter Language with Community-Level Health Outcomes

Abstract: We study how language on social media is linked to diseases such as atherosclerotic heart disease (AHD), diabetes and various types of cancer. Our proposed model leverages stateof-the-art sentence embeddings, followed by a regression model and clustering, without the need of additional labelled data. It allows to predict community-level medical outcomes from language, and thereby potentially translate these to the individual level. The method is applicable to a wide range of target variables and allows us to d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work includes both predictive models (input: language samples, output: some attribute about the author) and models that yield useful insights (input: language samples and attributes of the authors, output: differentiating language features depending on the attributes). Among many others, previous research has studied gender and age Nguyen et al, 2014;Peersman et al, 2011), political ideology (Iyyer et al, 2014;Preoţiuc-Pietro et al, 2017), health outcomes (Schneuwly et al, 2019), and personality traits (Schwartz et al, 2013). In this paper, we do not profile forecasters.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous work includes both predictive models (input: language samples, output: some attribute about the author) and models that yield useful insights (input: language samples and attributes of the authors, output: differentiating language features depending on the attributes). Among many others, previous research has studied gender and age Nguyen et al, 2014;Peersman et al, 2011), political ideology (Iyyer et al, 2014;Preoţiuc-Pietro et al, 2017), health outcomes (Schneuwly et al, 2019), and personality traits (Schwartz et al, 2013). In this paper, we do not profile forecasters.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 94%