2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.707.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) for Sodicity Tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1000-grain weight registered positive and significant association with kernel length (0.5382**) kernel breadth (0.6791**) and negative correlation association with head rice recovery (-0.4713**), L/B ratio (-0.1924*), hulling% (-0.2590**), milling% (-0.1773*) whereas it had positive significant association with grain yield per plant (0.2588**). These results are in line with the earlier reports of Babu et al [14], Nikhil et al [15], Lakshmi et al [16], Sarwar et al [2], Abdala et al [17], Devi et al [3], Prakash et al [18], Kiranmayee et al [19], Thorat et al [20] and Nanda et al [21] Islam et al [22] and Singh et al [24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1000-grain weight registered positive and significant association with kernel length (0.5382**) kernel breadth (0.6791**) and negative correlation association with head rice recovery (-0.4713**), L/B ratio (-0.1924*), hulling% (-0.2590**), milling% (-0.1773*) whereas it had positive significant association with grain yield per plant (0.2588**). These results are in line with the earlier reports of Babu et al [14], Nikhil et al [15], Lakshmi et al [16], Sarwar et al [2], Abdala et al [17], Devi et al [3], Prakash et al [18], Kiranmayee et al [19], Thorat et al [20] and Nanda et al [21] Islam et al [22] and Singh et al [24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It expressed positive indirect contribution through, number of productive tillers per plant (0.0438), kernel length (0.3608), and kernel breadth (0.4552) and negative indirect contribution through days to 50 per cent flowering (-0.2204), plant height (-0.1173), panicle length (-0.0402), number of grains per panicle (-0.3306), L/B ratio (-0.1290), hulling percentage (-0.1736), milling percentage (-0.1189) and head rice recovery (-0.3159). Nikhil et al [15], Lakshmi et al [16], Kishore et al [32], Sarwar et al [2], Prakash et al [18], Hemalatha et al [33], Kiranmayee et al [19], Arulmozhi et al [34] and Singh et al [24] also reported similar results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Positive correlation was recorded with grain yield per plant (0.0995). The similar finding have also been reported by Sarawgi et al, 1997;Chaudhary and Motiramani, 2003;Zahid et al, 2006;Kishore et al, 2007;Babar et al 2009;Jayasudha and Sharma 2010;Rahman et al 2011;Bhadru et al 2011;Maji and Shaibu 2012;Ahamed et al 2014;Sakina et al 2015;Sritama et al, 2015;Kumar et al 2018;Prakash et al 2018).…”
Section: Shiv Prakash Shrivastav Et Alsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore, these (biological yield per plant, spikelets per panicle, grains per panicle, panicle length, flag leaf area, and leaf nitrogen) characters emerged as most important associates of grain yield in rice. The strong positive association of grain yield with the characters mentioned above has also being reported in rice by earlier workers (Sarawgi et al, 1997;Chaudhary and Motiramani, 2003;Qamar et al, 2005;Ramkrishnan et al, 2006;Kishore et al, 2007;Babar et al 2009;Jayasudha and Sharma 2010;Rahman et al 2011;Bhadru et al 2011;Maji and Shaibu 2012;Ahamed et al 2014;Sakina et al 2015;Sritama et al, 2015;Kumar et al 2018;Prakash et al 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation