2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015jb012629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation‐based modeling and separation of geomagnetic field components

Abstract: We introduce a technique for the modeling and separation of geomagnetic field components that is based on an analysis of their correlation structures alone. The inversion is based on a Bayesian formulation, which allows the computation of uncertainties. The technique allows the incorporation of complex measurement geometries like observatory data in a simple way. We show how our technique is linked to other well‐known inversion techniques. A case study based on observational data is given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our modelling approach relies on a Kalman filter (Kalman 1960), a 3-step process where data assimilation relies on a correlation based technique (Holschneider et al 2016). The first step of the process is to model the magnetic field from a subset of data spanning the time interval [t k ; t k+1 ], through a re-weighted least square process (hereinafter the analysis step).…”
Section: Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our modelling approach relies on a Kalman filter (Kalman 1960), a 3-step process where data assimilation relies on a correlation based technique (Holschneider et al 2016). The first step of the process is to model the magnetic field from a subset of data spanning the time interval [t k ; t k+1 ], through a re-weighted least square process (hereinafter the analysis step).…”
Section: Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first step -the analysis, an a priori information on the field is updated through a correlation based data assimilation method described in Holschneider et al (2016). In this latter work, the spatial correlations of the different signals are described in the spherical harmonics (SH) domain and then used in the spatial domain to constrain the inversion process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data have been selected depending on their local time and for magnetically quiet periods (c.f., Lesur et al 2008). The model is made of a series of snapshot models, 3 months apart, that have been built through a Kalman filter approach combined with a correlation-based modeling technique for the analysis step (Holschneider et al 2016). Each snapshot model is parameterized in terms of spherical harmonics and includes static core field and secular variation contributions.…”
Section: Data 1: Poloidal Scalar Potential At the Cmb Obtained From Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of spectra are used for the model, flat ones, with E ∞ i ( ) = A 2 i where A i is a magnitude, and spectra of the form E ∞ i ( ) = A 2 i (2 + 1)F ( ), referred as C-based spectra, making equation 6 equivalent to the correlation kernels proposed by Holschneider et al (2016). Only 2 sources are characterized by a flat spectrum, the core field and the induced / residual ionospheric field.…”
Section: Prior Characterization Of Spatial and Temporal Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%