2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.3525284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation-based seismic velocity inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, I need to further test the approximations made in the modified gradient. Leeuwen (2010) showed that it is possible to further improve the objective function by multiplying with the proper weights and minimizing the correlation function instead of the lags, which will eliminate any picking. Finally, using correlation functions over extended images (Yang and Sava, 2009) could help provide better results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, I need to further test the approximations made in the modified gradient. Leeuwen (2010) showed that it is possible to further improve the objective function by multiplying with the proper weights and minimizing the correlation function instead of the lags, which will eliminate any picking. Finally, using correlation functions over extended images (Yang and Sava, 2009) could help provide better results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionals that give more weight to the kinematic than to the amplitude error between the seismic arrivals. They often involve the cross-correlation between the observed and modelled arrivals (Luo & Schuster 1991;van Leeuwen & Mulder 2010;van Leeuwen 2010). After cross-correlation, the arrival-time error can be picked by hand, which is tedious and to be avoided if possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%