1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6223(97)87258-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between adsorption and x-ray diffraction studies on viscose rayon based activated carbon cloth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This turbostratic model assumes that the sample is made of graphite-like microcrystallites, bounded by cross linking network, consisting of several graphite-like layers, stacked nearly parallel and equidistant, with each layer having a random orientation. The value of 002 is comparable with those reported by Kumar et al on activated carbon cloth [27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This turbostratic model assumes that the sample is made of graphite-like microcrystallites, bounded by cross linking network, consisting of several graphite-like layers, stacked nearly parallel and equidistant, with each layer having a random orientation. The value of 002 is comparable with those reported by Kumar et al on activated carbon cloth [27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The activated carbon derived from GSC exhibit the highest average crystallite thickness ( L c ), and the average number of graphitic layers ( N ), alongside low average graphene sheet diameter ( L a ). In addition, the low ratio of L c / L a predicts elevation in porosity, which was due to the effect of L c on the specific surface area in the inverse correlation of Kumar empirical formula ( S = 2/( ρL c )), where S is the predicted surface area and ρ is the graphite density 61 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the low ratio of L c /L a predicts elevation in porosity, which was due to the effect of L c on the specific surface area in the inverse correlation of Kumar empirical formula (S = 2/(ρL c )), where S is the predicted surface area and ρ is the graphite density. 61…”
Section: X-ray Diffractogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nilai La yang diperoleh pada elektroda SC lebih besar dari pada nilai La pada elektroda SA dan SB, sedangkan nilai Lc pada elektroda SC lebih kecil dari pada nilai Lc pada elektroda SA dan SB, ini menunjukkan bahwa Lc berbanding terbalik dengan La. Penurunan nilai Lc dipengaruhi oleh ukuran partikel yang digunakan, seiring meningkatnya ukuran partikel maka lebar timbunan mikrokristalin semakin besar sedangkan untuk tinggi timbunan mikrokristalin berkurang sehingga luas permukaan yang dihasilkan akan semakin besar hal ini didukung dengan teori yang menyatakan S= 2/ρLc artinya nilai Lc yang kecil menghasilkan luas permukaan yang besar [8].…”
Section: Tabel 1 Data Parameter Kisi Karbon Aktif Bunga Rumput Gajahunclassified